What to do with old pharma sites?

Status
Not open for further replies.

thatsme

New member
Jun 19, 2007
20
0
0
www.easyofficestore.com
I have number of pharma sites, earlier used with various affiliate programs but I stopped using these programs for last around one year.

So in replacement I used AdSense with little change and earning good money but Google is banning sites one by one due to content & design issue (mainly duplicate content - which is common in this niche), so reducing earning.

Now I am in search of some method I can use in replacement to AdSense, so that I can continue earning through those sites, but:

- I dont want to go back to pharma
- Herbal alternatives dont do much
- Most of the AdSense alternatives do not like pharma sites

Can you guys please suggest some way to use those sites in a better manner?

Help will be appriciated. Thanks in Advance!
 


Which drugs were you promoting? Controlled, non controlled? Depending on what you were promoting makes a difference in how you can monetize. How much traffic are you getting now to these sites and for what? If you still get a lot of traffic, maybe consider selling to someone who is still in the game.
 
all kinds of general controlled and non-controlleds with some sites for mainly weight loss drugs. Traffic is good that it makes me around $50 per day. I am not considering selling sites becuase - first it will block all earnings and second no one will give good pricing as industry is in problems.

Traffic comes mainly to weight loss.
 
With weight loss you might as well offer the free trials that are so popular. Acai, wu yi, green tea, and the various herbal phens that are out there.
 
why not go back to these affiliate programs rather than adsense? i'm actively involved in a number of pharma sites and still earning good money from them. A friend of mine recently sold his weight loss site for just under $20k USD, so there are still buyers out there. Pm me if you would like more info.
 
Weight loss is still massive, it's concerning that the sites are getting banned? Is there some other reason that this might be happening because I've not seen sites just get banned for dup content (they usually just get filtered in the serps).
 
This is what I received from G!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
While reviewing your account, we noticed that you are currently displaying Google ads in a manner that is not compliant with our policies. For instance, we found violations of AdSense policies on pages such as site1, site2, and site3.
Publishers may not place Google ads on pages that violate Google’s webmaster quality guidelines (Webmaster Guidelines - Webmaster Help Center). While we've included the following excerpts from these guidelines, we recommend that you take the time to review them in their entirety.
* Make pages for users, not for search engines.
* Don't employ cloaking or sneaky redirects.
* Don't load pages with irrelevant words.
* Don't create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content.
* Don't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank.
* Avoid "doorway" pages created just for search engines, or other "cookie cutter" approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content.
* Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"
* If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.

As a result, we have disabled ad serving to the site.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

These were not doorway pages and content was written by me - but it was written for selling meds and there were no meds selling on sites, so may that is the reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.