Why Very Successful Guys Should Avoid An Exclusive Girlfriend At All Costs

It's pretty simple... find a chick who isn't a psycho bitch and see if it works, if it goes good settle down and enjoy it.

If you can't find a good chick, don't worry just focus on other things, so many guys go hunting for bitches in clubs and get all butthurt when PUA shit doesn't actually work, all you need at the end of the day is confidence without being a douche, a decent gym routine will help a lot but at the end of the day it all comes down to knowing how to express yourself without being a creeper.

IDK how the fuck these guys make bank selling this shit, then again look at berries and all that other crap that moves is massive amounts because society is wack, I love it.
 


What I don't get about all this "dating market" + "ladder theory" bullshit is it completely ignores the fact that a man might actually want children at some point in their lives.

Seriously, living like a 25 year old is fucking awesome when you're 25. But at 40+? Really?

Let me give you a hint. Here's someone who lives that lifestyle to the max:

stringfellow-08.jpg


You really want to be this guy?
 
Philip P said:
Lol, you posted a link to one of the shittiest articles I've read in a while and now you're getting all sensitive because people are laughing at it, and by association, at you too.
Click to expand...
sensitive eh? i don't have an emotional attachment to wickedfire whatsoever. just found the link to the article on another site and though y'all would be intertested since there's so much of that kind of stuff on here. now everyone is talking about pickup artist stuff i have no idea about.
 
negatives of a monogamous relationship have always outweighed the positives, this is the way I have felt since I was 17, and I live my life accordingly: single, having lots of sex with random chickenhead hoes.
 
NetMillion said:
negatives of a monogamous relationship have always outweighed the positives, this is the way I have felt since I was 17, and I live my life accordingly: single, having lots of sex with random chickenhead hoes.
Click to expand...

That'll work well for you until you're about 35. Then you better hope you're loaded or the game is up.
 
Sounds like the author hasn't actually ever met a quality girl in his life. There _are_ girls out there who are smart, beautiful, and have good jobs. You just don't find many of those if you're into girls that spend their weekends at the mall rather than in the mountains skiing or hiking.

I guess it also depends if you're just looking to get laid, or if you want to form a real connection with someone to share your life with.
 
ryanjm said:
Sounds like the author hasn't actually ever met a quality girl in his life. There _are_ girls out there who are smart, beautiful, and have good jobs. You just don't find many of those if you're into girls that spend their weekends at the mall rather than in the mountains skiing or hiking.

I guess it also depends if you're just looking to get laid, or if you want to form a real connection with someone to share your life with.
Click to expand...

+1
Yup
 
I read the whole thing because it is relevant to my interests.

He does come across like someone that is way too into himself, but I understand he was trying to qualify his opinion. However, there were numerous typos in the article. Sup with that?

Anyway, like it or not, he is basically right. It is so easy to get lulled into the mundane world of a long-term relationship that I think some of you guys don't even see it. And when it's pointed out, cognitive dissonance goes into overdrive and of course you have every rationalization for getting married or whatever.

Obviously there are some women that are exceptions to the rule, but I think we can all agree that very few of the women that people CLAIM to be exceptions to the rule actually are exceptions to the rule.

That's all I'm sayin'.
 
I will be curious to see the statistics on marriage after another decade or so. People between the ages of 18-35 right now, the majority probably grew up in divorced households/extended families as well.

I have noticed among my group of friends that it seems like the ones with parents still together mainly seem to be all about longterm relationships and start getting "anxious" when they are not in a relationship with someone for an extended period of time.

I noticed this especially with many of my female friends. It is almost like a different form of social anxiety where they feel like they NEED to be in a relationship...whether that is all emotional, mental, financially motivated I have no idea...

Where as a lot of my friends that come from "less stable" homes seem to be enjoying the single life well into their early thirties, both male and female.
 
guysmy said:
I agree with his critique of monogamy but think the article is primarily designed to stroke egos.

His readers already assume they are outlier males or are transitioning into being one so this is an easy sale. Generally, these dudes rate a whole lot lower in the dating marketplace than they think. Everyone wants to believe they are that special person or have unlimited potential.
Click to expand...
This. Like Steve Pavlina, the sale is easier when the sucker forking over the dollars feels good about himself or thinks they're "special".

If you read the comments he's quick to refute fallacies by dissenters (eg; no monogamy = no kids, end of genetic lineage), but nearly all the points he makes are fallacies themselves. Loaded with assumptions and a smug sense of superiority. Newsflash: women have minds capable of thought as well. Generally inferior and estrogen filled minds, but they still do have minds.

My favorite comment:

Hi Jesse,
Some of the articles you posted before, for instance the one about male conditioning, and your general beliefs on pick up are just short of genius. However, I have to disagree with you on the point you’re making here.
I. You’re assuming there are no girls out there like you, striving to attain outlier status.
2. you’re equating your own modest income and ability to attain it without a 9-5 desk job as something super successful (kudos to that I’ll admit its pretty great)
I think what you’re forgetting is that life is not necessarily just about traveling across the world, checking out beaches and girls.
Some of us might strive to be famous writers, professional athletes, or even scientists eg. people with a tangible value and ability for other people’s benefits and enjoyments.
This argument applies to celebrities as well. I consider celebrities in general to be normal people with luxurious lives and inordinate amounts of fame. That doesn’t mean they reached self fulfillment. I find that most truly TALENTED actors (eg those that are passionate about their careers) are not the ones on the tabloids.
You immerse yourself in a life dedicated to voyeurism, partying, travel, hot sex, and luxury, and of course you’re going to immerse yourself in shallow, like minded people.
Do you think that smart, dedicated, physically attractive men and women who care about other things besides money and emotional cuddling don’t exist? They do. That’s a different kind of outlier status you have to be to find them. Research facilities, training camps, art studios, that’s where you’re going to find such people. The hot ones are rare yes but they do exist and I’ve seen them. They certainly won’t be caught nearly as often at the clubs as the women you complain of.
Click to expand...
I never understood how so many people unquestioningly swallow the BS about mixing platonic love and sexual lust anyway. Meh, what a waste of time.
 
Interesting read. I will probably be more like him when I get my shit right *until I am ready to settle down*.... Right now its business as usual = Fuck bitches, get money.
 
Another pick up artists who thinks he is an outlier because he can talk club sluts into bed. I don't nessecarily disagree with him and that for most successful men, relationships with most western women offer little to no benefit, but that is because western women in general are useless when it comes to creating a warm, loving family enviroment. They don't cook, clean, take care of themselves, give frequent blowjobs or make you laugh. It's a totally different story with women from traditional cultures who will go out of their way to keep their man if they think he is a catch. Most western women, European in particular, are only good for pump and dump. So many chumps are only with their girlfriends because they are afraid of being alone. Lets be honest, the ration of good women to bad in the west is 1:9 if that even.
 
This guy claims 99% of women are "low-quality" in his opening paragraph - what an ass. He goes on to list qualities he has like being in shape and being well-traveled, acting like these are somehow super special or rare. The rest of the article is completely saturated with stereotypes and cynicism, all the while attempting to appear as if it were written from some "expert" angle. The only thing the author is an expert in is being a jackass.
 
ryanjm said:
Sounds like the author hasn't actually ever met a quality girl in his life. There _are_ girls out there who are smart, beautiful, and have good jobs. You just don't find many of those if you're into girls that spend their weekends at the mall rather than in the mountains skiing or hiking.

I guess it also depends if you're just looking to get laid, or if you want to form a real connection with someone to share your life with.
Click to expand...
I've gone skiing every year for the past 7 years. Skier chicks are no different than any other chick except they ski. A girl can go to the gym and get more fit than a skier.

Shit I'm 32 and just the other night hooked up with 2 hot early 20s girls I was sitting next to at a Sushi restaurant. Guys were buying them sake from across the restaurant and I didn't do shit or even hardly talk to them. Just said a few words and met them at a bar later. I think all I said was, "this ice cream tastes like grass." Probably stood out to them cuz I was the guy who sat at the bar of a nice, dressy sushi restuarant in a t-shirt not giving a fuck.
 
Last edited:
jsherloc said:
I will be curious to see the statistics on marriage after another decade or so. People between the ages of 18-35 right now, the majority probably grew up in divorced households/extended families as well.

I have noticed among my group of friends that it seems like the ones with parents still together mainly seem to be all about longterm relationships and start getting "anxious" when they are not in a relationship with someone for an extended period of time.

I noticed this especially with many of my female friends. It is almost like a different form of social anxiety where they feel like they NEED to be in a relationship...whether that is all emotional, mental, financially motivated I have no idea...

Where as a lot of my friends that come from "less stable" homes seem to be enjoying the single life well into their early thirties, both male and female.
Click to expand...
This actually makes sense. Marriage and long relationships actually seem like more of an American thing to me anyways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom