Conspiracy Theories Not Welcome In UK Schools - Reeducation needed

SeoReborn

New member
Mar 5, 2008
2,216
28
0
London UK
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYwnviP7JME&"]"Conspiracy theories" not welcome in UK schools - Reeducation needed! - YouTube[/ame]

Create a fake news about fox attacks, and once pupils believe the fake news, reveal its been made up and call it a conspiracy theory. Basically trying to imprint on their minds that fake = conspiracy theory.

That fake news should be taught as what it is, example of propaganda on main stream news.
 


Just watched it. (this is why I don't watch the BBC generally)

1. Demos have no power. They're some independent think tank, who cares what they think.
2. Since when is fox attacks a "conspiracy theory"? So what, the foxes were sitting round a table, conspiring as to how they could attack some people?
 
OP has links to Alex Jones in sig.. you're a fucking retard OP. AJ is nothing more than a marketer.

129095737977046362.jpg
 
Essentially the same as learning how to tell reliable from dubious sources in history class. I'd say it's just another attempt by schools/government/old people to cope with the impact of sth. they're not familiar with ( the internet), rather than indoctrination. Must be a pain in the ass, if all the 15 year olds in your class bring up conspiracy theories for every major historical event, because they don't question what they read.
 
Essentially the same as learning how to tell reliable from dubious sources in history class. I'd say it's just another attempt by schools/government/old people to cope with the impact of sth. they're not familiar with ( the internet), rather than indoctrination. Must be a pain in the ass, if all the 15 year olds in your class bring up conspiracy theories for every major historical event, because they don't question what they read.

That was my other thought - don't they teach kids history any more? I remember doing loads on sources.
 
Alex Jones uses judgmental language all the time.

Your point? Alex Jones uses judgmental language all the time and so I conclude... [fill this in]. A few examples of him using judgmental language are..... [fill this in] and in each of those cases, it proves/disproves ...[fill this in]
 
I am not a retard because ____. Alex Jones is so much more than a marketer because _____.

right?

There is a CLEAR difference between me saying poisonsembrace used judgemental language and Ar Scion saying Alex uses judgmental language.

1. Poisonsembrance WITHOUT providing any backup to his claim, says that Alex Jones is nothing more than a marketer, Poisonsembrance uses ONLY judgmental language. So we know the purpose of poisonsembrance's judgmental language, yet Ar Scion just says Alex uses judgemental language without elaboration.
2. I pointed out Poisonsembrance used judgemental language, and people can see that this is the case. Ar Scion have not pointed out when Alex used judgmental language. Since Ar Scion says Alex uses judgemental language ALL THE TIME, then it shouldn't be difficult to find a few cases and their purposes.

From this it is pretty clear what my previous post was getting at. To establish what Ar Scion was trying to point out.

Also you've committed a straw man:

Alex Jones is so much more than a marketer because _____.

When did I say Alex Jones is so much more than a marketer?

Also what did Poisonsembrance really mean when he said Alex Jones is nothing more than a marketer. Does it mean everything Alex says is false? You sure don't know what he really meant yourself yet you tried to use 'much more than a marketer' in your argument.

I am not a retard because ____.

There's no need for me to explain to you whether I am a retard or not, as I have no claims either way. It is Poisonsembrance who claimed I'm a retard, you ask him about that.


No. Your argument is void and fallacious.
 
I am not a retard because ____. Alex Jones is so much more than a marketer because _____.

right?

You won't get to him. Here is the way he interprets data:
Is it retarded and thus supports my retardation? Yes. Profusely agree.
Is it retarded and thus supports my retardation? No? Then provide argumentum ad nauseam.
 
Your point?

Oh? Lemme help you out.

Alex Jones uses judgmental language all the time and so I conclude that your denigration of judgmental language while you endorse him is hypocritical. In short, if you hate judgmental language, you will hate Alex Jones.

A few examples of him using judgmental language are..... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY3XQYA2tQ4]Alex Jones' Anger Backfires - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yRJHJxkmnk]Alex Jones Paranoid Everyone is a Pedophile - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ct21YCEiWMM]Alex Jones Goes Ape - YouTube[/ame]

and in each of those cases, it proves that he employs judgmental language in order to bully, harass and demean people. He attempts to stifle disagreement, free thought and opinion and stoke fear and irrationality in his viewers.

He is an idiot.

You just don't realize it yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greenleaves
There once was a man from Nantucket
I gave him a bucket and he began to fuck it
While he gave me a curious stare
When he was done he poured it on a fair maidens hair