If you really hate the US that much, just don't pay US taxes when you move away. You won't be allowed back but, you wouldn't want to come back right?
There are certainly other factors... Family, friends, large objects I can't ship, my favorite restaurant. etc... I'd honestly rather not move but the decline of liberty here is rapidly making it all not worthwhile.
I don't hate America itself; America IS the constitution that the assholes in charge are trampling all over. I hate the assholes like lobbyists, the politicians they control, the central banks, and of course the MIC. As for the Libtards/Socialists, I feel they are just under-educated, and think of them as potentially good neighbors if they are forced to learn about liberty one day.
And PS; if you don't pay your taxes when you move away bad things can happen to you. Depending on your wealth you can find it all sucked out of your bank account from afar. The Uncle Sam's central bank controls it all.
Again, it's not an absolute abstract like you propose it. You can scale down the redistribution of wealth to a point where it's not entirely corrupt, but also functions. It's not "all or nothing".
Wow, you still don't get it! You just said: "scale down the redistribution of wealth to a point where it's not entirely corrupt" - Meaning that you feel there is some point when wealth redistribution is justified.
Did you watch the film about george above? I just don't see how you can think like that. It is simply NEVER justified, it's always been unjust.
A dumbass, poor redneck woman has 10 babies. She works at McDonalds and expects food stamps to pay for most of her babies. A libertarian comes into office and drastically cuts food stamps, because we should not encourage stupid people to breed and have 10 babies.
Do you let these babies starve to death? Does the government take them from the mother and throw them in orphanages? The mother is stupid and can't make enough money to support her children, how does a minimalistic government deal with this?
Alright, I'll play your game here.
Since we aren't starting from scratch and don't want to start a civil war or watch thousands go die in the street painfully, obviously there must be a transitional period.
Any Libertarian that comes in the office and gets enough support from congress to do something about this must have a damn good plan to EDUCATE and then WEAN OFF these bloodsuckers.
I think under the circumstances it would take a whole decade. Sadly foodstamps would continue until each individually 'graduates' within that decade.
Such a president should come in with a funding package bill to get passed that basically pays for the education (one time only) of everyone who is currently on welfare... And no I'm not talking about a GED equivalent or any such shit... I'm talking about a "why this is wrong and why it will cease to exist" education followed by legitimate job skills training.
Then this president must have a plan for what happens in 10 years when all these workers flood the market... The jobs need to be there. So it's going to be a very tough (but possible) task of matching demand to jobs with proper timing.
Sure there will be holdouts, but they've been given more than ample warning and everything else they need. If they still aren't getting with the program than these poor fools will be in the exact same boat as our chronically homeless people today are. Homeless shelters may swell for a while at that point; a whole different plan should probably be instituted for the homeless to give them some new type of therapy for their mental disorder. (Including the holdouts.)
Clear enough? Major problems require major solutions, but the endgame is to get rid of all entitlements and wealth redistribution. If you can't strive for that you can't strive for fairness at all.
