Banning the word "Penguin" and "Panda" from BST's?

I don't look at it as censorship.

More like publishing standard.
THIS
I'm sick and tired of this crap. Penguin this, Panda that... Most BST sellers are selling the same kind of links as always, read social bookmarks, profiles, blog comments, posts, web 2.0 etc. Nevertheless they just LOVE to call it bullshit like "The Ultimate SEO Blasting Service" and similar. Now at least they can't make false claims about this stuff being "Penguin safe" :ticking:
 


This is letting the free market decide. WickedFire is a privately owned entity.
You don't think I know that? There's a reason I put what I said in quotes.
 
Panda is onpage though ...
I should look more carefully, sorry, I thought this was for all sections of the BST.

Even if we just looked at the L&S section though, if someone was offering web 2.0s for example, it'd be possible to test how well they withstand against panda, and make the content (when I say that, I include images/video etc) more hardy against it.
 
For the people that want their copy to suggest their service is penguin proof, indirectly suggest it. If you have anchor diversity and other relevant factors, people that actually want to make money in todays SERP should know that these are the things that penguin looks for, so it's indirectly suggesting it's penguin safe by mentioning these changes to your service. That's my spin to it, It def helps clear things up in the BST. When people use blind copy that feeds off hype, that's not wanted here, which is why I think it's banned now. But that's not to say you can't write your copy in a way that proves you've responded to penguin, just be smart about it
 
HmMTr.jpg
 
Translation: Internet Marketers don't want to have to sift through the Internet Marketing bullshit that we put on our own websites to dupe soccer moms.