Classic HB:
1 day later:
http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-...think-blacks-viciously-racist-animals-ii.html
Just out of curiosity bro, can you walk and chew gum at the same time
You should probably understand the difference between racially based critiques of African Americans and culturally based critiques of them. Virtually all of my threads on the topic are criticisms on American blacks' current culture and how it is inevitably headed for a conflict with white America.
Your threads, on the other hand, are measly diatribes obsessing on the racial and genetic aspects of black Americans. As I stated in your thread, I find that a portion of blacks in America tend to obsess over their "blackness", as if there is something inherently special about the mere color of their skin.
I have met blacks from Liberia, Haiti, Algeria, etc.. who are vastly different from American blacks culture-wise, because they have not been pampered and coddled by the plantation-government complex. One Haitian even observed to me upon arriving here that "there are blacks and there are niggers", referring to black American culture.
It would probably do you some good to understand the distinction.
this classic thread where shady (xmcp123) destroyed hellboy back during the julian assange thing...
I've heard you say this in other places. It reminds me of the Democrats immediately after the vice presidential debate, papering over Biden's disgraceful performance with cries and declarations of an outstanding demolition.
The analogy between the Democrats' post-debate hype and your repeated cries of exultation is eerily similar, although no such comparison can be made between Biden's shameful display and shady's arguments.
If you actually read that thread, you'll see that shady wasn't necessarily making an argument for or against(although he leaned somewhat in Assange's direction), as much as he was stating that what he did could be considered legal if he was considered a member of the press.
My argument was based more on whether it was morally right or wrong, whether such blatant manipulation of our freedoms against us should be tolerated. My own opinion is that a very delicate exception should be carved out against those who would pose as "journalists" to damage the US, both domestically and abroad. This of course raises new questions, but there is no choice when dealing with an enemy who skillfully uses our laws against us. Shady's assertion that Assange's actions were legal only apply if he is considered a journalist or member of the press. That is how they exploit our laws against us.
It would do you some good in the future to actually understand the nuances of the different arguments. If you actually go back and read the thread that you appear to know nothing about, you would find that the two arguments aren't even necessarily conflicting; in fact, they actually complement each other and give added texture and depth to the discussion.
