Does anyone still support the drug war?
- Thread starter mattlock25
- Start date
Thank you for proving my point.
What an intellectually bankrupt movement the pro-drug crowd is.
Your point that you think the American founders should have gone to jail?
Or your point that people shouldn't have liberty?
Says the pro-government conservative, LMFAO.
Strawman.
Strawman.
You're making your movement look bad. Toke up a little more.
You said, break the law, go to jail. Your position is that the law is ALWAYS right.
If that is true, then the American founders were criminals for breaking the King's law.
Also, if you truly believed in liberty, then you wouldn't blindly support law over non-crimes.
So, no they are not a strawmen, they are logically extending the implications of your silliness.
You know, LOGIC.
I don't do drugs.
Not only that, but he'd be fine with imprisoning people like this too..
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY6UTnS6Z-A]Gov. Mitt Romney meets a medical marijuana patient--Oct. 6 - YouTube[/ame]
This thread has taught me one thing: who I'd like to have a beer with and who I would avoid at all costs.
Incidentally, legalization of drug use means nothing. If I want to smoke, I'll smoke. That a bunch of lying, sociopathic charlatans suddenly deem that I can smoke matters not at all. Their rule over me is illegitimate.
That's not to say I will smoke in front of them. But nor would I call John Gotti's wife a whore. Same principle of self-preservation, different mafias.
Incidentally, legalization of drug use means nothing. If I want to smoke, I'll smoke. That a bunch of lying, sociopathic charlatans suddenly deem that I can smoke matters not at all. Their rule over me is illegitimate.
That's not to say I will smoke in front of them. But nor would I call John Gotti's wife a whore. Same principle of self-preservation, different mafias.
Another strawman.
This is generally how the pro-drug crowd argues against drug laws:
1) It's expensive.
2) It doesn't work.
3) It doesn't harm anyone.
Reason number three is the only one that actually argues for whether drug laws are right or wrong, which is the only question that matters.
It's also patently false, because obviously drugs affect your future children.
The question of whether a law that bans an act "works" or not is absurd. Either a society determines that such an act should be banned or not. It's not a process. It's a moral decision.
Needless to say, when the druggies' one feeble argument is knocked down, they have nothing left except:
COLLECTIVIST!!!
That's where you're movement is at right now. But I don't expect anyone here to actually understand what I'm saying.
Beck is hardly the only person calling Obama a communist. Get out of your WF bubble.
Obviously this is how intelligent and respected people communicate their ideas.
Yeah, and a lot of people thought the earth was flat.
And your point is what?
You still can't articulate what Obama has done to destroy America.
Why would anyone take anything you say seriously, when you can't prove anything that you say?
Hey guess what. Obamacare is law too.
And that, in a couple posts, is the basic pattern of the pro-drug crowd.
A couple crappy reasons, followed by some slurs, followed by frantic deflections.
And that's why drugs shouldn't be banned!
Brainwashed by whom? And I don't believe I used the word collectivist once. Maybe when you make some points worth countering they will be refuted. Up until now the only argument you made against the drug war was:
Which is just a bunch of inane rambling with no substance and a severe lack of anything credible. You're arguing for the government to render a person defenseless, without vehicular transportation, and forcefully sterilized, for the privileged of doing what I want with my body. Yea Freedom!
Yeah yeah, straw-man, little bitch, collectivist.
yes.
We should probably end the murder war then.
No, you posted this:
Semantics much?
Except it's not just your body, it's your children as well. How dare you deprive them of their liberty!
Will there be some sort of exemption for people who don't want/aren't able to have children?
Or if my children are adults and live on their own, will you let me resume casual use of narcotics?
