London machete attack!



Its going to be intresting to watch the UK slowly succcumb to Islam in the next 20 years. The liberal islamic apologists allowed it to happen. And their children will pay the price.

Retard.

Noone is succumbing to anything.
 
Exactly. Did you also read how one of the witnesses said they called the cops, but took forever to come? Another reason to have guns, 911 just isn't fast enough.

No... If guns were widely available, these guys wouldn't have had a crappy rusty old gun that backfired and blew his finger off. They might have got hold of assault weapons and killed dozens.
 
I always wondered what an American accent sounds like to you chaps. Never really heard it described by anyone from those far away parts on the map.

accents2.png
 
I'm not getting into the whole IQ/race debate, but I like you enough to tell you that this graph is 100% completely made up. It was debunked a long time ago (sorry for the Snopes link but I'm too lazy to find a better source). Don't feel bad though, The Economist fell for something similar in 2000.

Meh, so what?

Still does not debunk the rest of my post.

Just looking around you should be enough to tell you that IQ is not based on race, but more on socioeconomic factors and education.

Test design is very, very complicated and the IQ test is a very good example of this.

Up to now, a test of general intelligence that is independent from culture and education has not been found.

Math problems in the IQ test are one easy found example.

(Let's not get into the debate on what exactly IS general intelligence - that one has been keeping the research community busy for the last decades)

As it stands, the IQ is a measure across several factors, trying to arrive at some notion of general intelligence.

As for all this, the reliability of it, variability, retest validity, the Flynn effect, etc, etc.. refer to your nearest academically inclined psychologist or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Reliability_and_validity

However, it is still one of the most widely used tests in practice. Please just keep in mind that it can not easily be transported across big divides (culture, countries, continents) because of its shortcomings.

If you really want to get into the whole debate on race, wikipedia actually IS a good starting point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

Especially the adoption studies should make you listen up

Small excerpt:
Eyferth (1961) studied the out-of-wedlock children of black and white soldiers stationed in Germany after World War 2 and then raised by white German mothers and found no significant differences. Tizard et al. (1972) studied black (African and West Indian), white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. Three out of four tests found no significant differences. One test found higher scores for non-whites.[117]

TL;DR
It is not about race


::emp::
 
Meh, so what?

Still does not debunk the rest of my post.

Just looking around you should be enough to tell you that IQ is not based on race, but more on socioeconomic factors and education.

Test design is very, very complicated and the IQ test is a very good example of this.

Up to now, a test of general intelligence that is independent from culture and education has not been found.

Math problems in the IQ test are one easy found example.

(Let's not get into the debate on what exactly IS general intelligence - that one has been keeping the research community busy for the last decades)

As it stands, the IQ is a measure across several factors, trying to arrive at some notion of general intelligence.

As for all this, the reliability of it, variability, retest validity, the Flynn effect, etc, etc.. refer to your nearest academically inclined psychologist or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Reliability_and_validity

However, it is still one of the most widely used tests in practice. Please just keep in mind that it can not easily be transported across big divides (culture, countries, continents) because of its shortcomings.

If you really want to get into the whole debate on race, wikipedia actually IS a good starting point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

Especially the adoption studies should make you listen up

Small excerpt:


TL;DR
It is not about race


::emp::


Let me guess the reply you will get:

You are Muslim loving liberal communist who is justifying all the evil done by Muslims. You are a traitor to Empire and your race!
 
So all the Americans get sent back to their native countries in Europe

lol that would be awesome, a couple hundred million murikans all relocating back to Europe in one fell swoop. I'm sure you'd welcome us with open arms. :drinkup:
 
So all the Americans get sent back to their native countries in Europe and Africa?

::emp::

Sure thing. Should we also send back to Asia the people that descend directly from aborigines who came to north America and south America using the northen passage several thousand years ago?.

Seriously, these individuals are fucking savages and must be sent to prison for life or deported to the fucked regions they are come from.

I'm also against any country that invades other nations, killing thousands or innocent civilians for the wrong reasons [most of the time that is].
 
Sure thing. Should we also send back to Asia the people that descend directly from aborigines who came to north America and south America using the northen passage several thousand years ago?.

Seriously, these individuals are fucking savages and must be sent to prison for life or deported to the fucked regions they are come from.

I'm also against any country that invades other nations, killing thousands or innocent civilians for the wrong reasons [most of the time that is].

That sending back thing was a joke.

If with "those savages" you imply the people who killed the soldier, then those should be trialed and incarcerated according to UK law.
This is the way a modern state deals with murderers, regardless of motive or ethnicity.

Your last point I laughed at... sooooo.... what about that US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan?

::emp::
 
Can you guys please grow your brain?

That image shows women in Tehran, Iran before the Islamistic regime took hold.

AHAAAA! (O'Reilly style) you say, but, sadly, nope.

Iran has been an officially Islamic country since when?

Oh ya, that's right... 1501


Source: Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Yuh

Islam as the main religion does not seem to be the problem.
A government BASED on religion is a problem though, and this is what has been/is happening in Iran, Egypt, etc...

And yes, also a problem if the government is based on Christianity, look into the dark ages in Europe for that.

::emp::
Those countries are shit because of Islam. Also banning rusvic because of his opinion. Nice mod abuse. Don't worry your not immortal cakes got banned for the same shit. Now go ahead abuse your mod status and ban me. Also putting emp at the end of all your posts is very obnoxious.
 
Before you attack innocent Muslim community please don't forget about Christians organizing Crusades and all these boys molested by Catholic priests.

Are you serious? I hope your trolling because if not, its this kind of backwards ass dumb fuck thinking that is what is wrong with the world that people live in today.

Oh, i am suppose to pay taxes so that minorities can go to college for free because of something a person of my same color did a couple hundred years ago?

Oh, i am suppose to let myself get beheaded because of something someone did to non christians 400-900 years ago?

Oh, i should let someone get attacked and murdered because some 80 year old priest molested a little boy that I have nothing to do with?

Oh, I guess everyone that has ever gone to Penn State also needs to get tied up, put on a plane, and blown up because of their choice of college too?