Conspiracy Theories and Athiesm

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe he ate shrooms and hallucinated these visions


amanita_muscaria_red.jpg


The Pharmacratic Inquisition

^ Very interesting and convincing evidence on the relations between psychedelic drugs and the mythology of Christianity.
 


it's all symbolism. and sloppy science. and societal structurizing. useful, but limiting.
and the real conspiracy is what they've left out of the bible.

teulchun-top1.jpg


beyond that -- my belief is that belief creates, and mass belief creates massively.
so you gotta be careful with what you believe. most don't.

you've got your hardcore bible thumpers who want to bring about those wonderful predictions in the book of revelations -- destroying humanity to save humanity. you've got your poisonous snake handlers protected by their faith in imaginary friends. you've got 12 year old kids ready and willing to spend 3 minutes cutting off a dude's head with a bowie knife because their beliefs say that man is unfit to live.

aside from snake handlers (who remarkably almost never get bitten, but that's another essay or three on intent and reality hacking) these are incredibly destructive beliefs based on misunderstood instructions.

and yes, it's a goddamn conspiracy.

nostradamus I don't know about. the skeptic consensus puts his stuff in the realm of cold reading, but since so many people believe that I'm gonna call bullshit and say he was a templar operative providing coded communications and instructions to move against the then-church-controlled state.

he did get king henry's death by jousting 100% right after all. maybe it was an order, not a prediction.

whoa. maybe the book of revelations is an order.
that's a friggin mind blow right there.

by the by, a higher power does not have to wear robes and sport a massive beard. that's my main issue with thiests, and athiests.

this goes for any 'absolute' truth that a belief structure may teach.
absolutely convinced they're absolutely right.
absolutely ridiculous.

but understandable.

anyway. smart money says whether or not end times predictions happen, is up to you. and you.


After reading your post I will add to what I said earlier about being an Atheist.

I would be "Pleasantly" surprised to find that there really is a higher power. To know that two amoebae did not just bump butts to create us or that some Alien species was not just conducting some experiment that has gone awry would be excellent news.

Hell, just to actually have a ghost haunt me would be enough to change "my" mind. LOL!!


Sincerely,

MT
 
Maybe he ate shrooms and hallucinated these visions


amanita_muscaria_red.jpg


The Pharmacratic Inquisition

^ Very interesting and convincing evidence on the relations between psychedelic drugs and the mythology of Christianity.

+REP!! Nice!!!

Sincerely,

MT

P.S. I've never partaken in the delicacy myself, but I have had a few friends that enjoyed "Tea Time" after a stroll through the pasture. (Theirs were a little more purplish though, if I'm remembering correctly. LOL!!)
 
When have you ever stepped back to entertain the "POSSIBILITY" that those who believe differently than you politically aren't "Brainwashed" (see you sig for evidence of this statement) but perhaps are simply interpreting the facts differently?
You are the poster child for fanatical pretentiousness, so it seems to me to be very funny you are attacking popeye for a variation of the same.
 
...snippage ...
He described a modern computer and the internet in great detail and called it "The Beast."

He gave an extremely complex math code using mathematics that didn't exist for another 1600 years and said you will know what it means when it is needed. It wasn't until the mainframe computer was invented that they were able to figure out the result was 666.

Sorry, but that is nutso conspiracy theory at its finest. Book and exact text for those?

::emp::
 
It seems to me that religion by definition is a means to control a large group by a singularity or very small group.
In the sense it is organized, sure.

Millions of people have read Atlas Shrugged. A significantly smaller # are Objectivists, which is the philosophical group based around the ideas in the book.

I don't conflate the bible with the church, or God with praying.

Ask any of the past historical figures, or present leaders for that matter, who had/have power. It did not matter whether it was spiritual religion or political religion, it served the purpose of imposing an individual's or a small group's desires on a large mass of people.
Science and modern collectivism (environmentalism, democracy, socialism) are the new means to control people. Instead of giving them a specific moral ethic, you propose multiple conflicting ones, and undermine critical thinkers as kooks or conspiracists.

Power is always in high demand, and so the methods of attaining it are always evolving.

Religion is something that can be good or evil, the entire enterprise is founded on interpretation.

But just like a bank robber drinking a coca cola doesn't make coke a crime enabling drug, nor does a priest diddling young boys make the bible a manual on child sexual abuse.

By being open minded, I mean making two logical progressions when you come to a conclusion. Instead of taking the first answer given, ask the question a second time, and this time question that first answer's veracity.

Most people believe what they are told. That is why flogs work. If they took the step of analyzing the flog, many would not convert.
 
It seems to me that religion by definition is a means to control a large group by a singularity or very small group.

Ask any of the past historical figures, or present leaders for that matter, who had/have power. It did not matter whether it was spiritual religion or political religion, it served the purpose of imposing an individual's or a small group's desires on a large mass of people.


Sincerely,

MT

Insightful as always MT - I am going to package all your threads and sell them as an ebook, lol...

Actually, in my humble opinion, the so-called "Bible" should be left out of all SCIENTIFIC discussions related to the origin of existence."

I look to QUANTUM PHYSICS, SCIENCE, REASON & LOGIC to form much of monotheistic beliefs.

QUANTUM PHYSICS HAS PROVEN WHAT MANY MYSTICS HAVE SAID FOR YEARS - THE EXISTENCE OF AN ENERGY NOT BOUND BY THE NEWTONION OR QUANTUM MECHANICAL SPACE/TIME Paradigm.

THIS IS NOT PSEUDO-SCIENCE!!

THIS IS SCIENCE!!


Science says that matter/energy can be neither created or destroyed.

If something can be neither created nor destroyed the only logical conclusion is that it is INFINITE.

In other words, it has always existed.

The Big Bang Theory - contrary to the masses' belief - DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED at what's been described as 1 trillionth of a second BEFORE "PLANCK'S MOMENT".

The only way that energy can exist is if a phenomena exists/existed outside of the space/time paradigm - in other words something not bound by c, aka the speed of light.


In the 14th chapter of Darwin's work, "Origin of Species" he states quite clearly that is theory is PREDECATED ON THE KEY ASSUMPTION That a naturally occuring, reproducing organism is the FOUNDATION of Evolution.


Therefore, if we take the scientific observations that:

1) Matter/Energy can neither be created nor destroyed - i.e. it has always existed

2) Since physical reality is bound by both time and space (i.e. c= 299 792 458/2) it is LOGICALLY FINITE - Therefore something on this plane of the physical which is FINITE could not have produced something INFINITE.

This is grade school, Aristocratic logic; it cannot be refuted rationally


3) According to the popularly held belief in Evolution, we exist solely due to a reproducing organism (again see the 14th Chapter of "Origin of Species"


4) Then, it is clear that something a) infinite and b) self producing was in fact the First Cause.


Antony Flew is known as the 20th century's most famous atheist. He wasn't interested in any stories about a guy named Adam and one woman named Eye "getting busy" in the garden of even serving as a LOGICAL, RATIONAL argument for the existence of a First Cause.


While at Oxford, he wrote “Theology and Falsification" and for years has debated priests, preachers, etc. on their crusade to make people believe that the LITERAL INTERPRETATION of the King James version of the Bible is scientifically correct or accurate.


Several years ago, after reading about the breakthroughs in DNA research and being a man unswervingly committed to rationality and reason, taking the argument put forth above (i.e. infinity + Darwin's work), his LOGIC AND REASON lead him to the following conclusion:

“It has become inordinately difficult even to begin to think about constructing a naturalistic theory of the evolution of that first reproducing organism,” “My whole life has been guided by the principle of Plato’s Socrates: Follow the evidence, wherever it leads.”

"It seems to me that the case for an Aristotelian God who has the characteristics of power and also intelligence, is now much stronger than it ever was before."

Max Planck the Father of Quantum Physics and Nobel Prize winner said quite emphatically:

""All Matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.""


Martin Reese, the famous theoretical physicist stated:
"In the beginning there were only probabilities. The universe could only come into existence if someone observed it. It does not matter that the observers turned up several billion years later. The universe exists because we are aware of it."

Pascal Jordan said,
""Observations not only disturb what is to be measured, they produce it."

John Wheeler the dad who gave me up for adoption (HAHA, J/K...say that because I love the guy) is another one. Princeton PHD Professor and student of Neils Bohr, he was one of the greatest theoretical quantum physicists of the past 109 years....

He said,
"“You can talk about people like Buddha, Jesus, Moses, Confucius, but the thing that convinced me that such people existed were the conversations with Bohr,” (see NY Times article)

The list goes on and on. For anyone who finds this stuff interesting, I'd encourage you to investigate the SCIENTIFIC FACTS and not be brainwashed by Jerry-Springer like interpretations of Scientific Truth.

As one professor has said in a current book I am reading about the relationship between consciousness and physical reality, he tells the author

"Though what you're saying is correct, presenting this material to NONSCIENTISTS is the intellectual equivalent of allowing children to play with loaded guns".

Many people drink up so called scientific "facts" the way holy rollers "drink up" whatever they hear in church.


ACCEPT NOTHING AS FACT WITHOUT YOUR OWN PERSONAL INVESTIGATION!

As Brian Josephson the 20-something year old Nobel Prize winner in physics smartly asserted:

"“One of my guiding principles…has been the scientist’s motto ‘Take nobody’s word for it (nullius in verba) a corollary of which is that if scientists as a whole denounce an idea this should not necessarily be taken as proof that the said idea is absurd: rather, one should examine carefully the alleged grounds for such opinions and judge how well these stand up to detailed scrutiny”



OK, soap box proclaimations over! Now I am off to build a landing page which I'll use to sell the Midas Touch ebook I'm about to push, lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midas Touch
You are the poster child for fanatical pretentiousness, so it seems to me to be very funny you are attacking popeye for a variation of the same.

Take a nap dear - really.

If you claim I'm pretentious, you're projecting your own insecurities on to me. I can be loquacious, passionate and supercilious at times - every girl has her shortcomings, lol- but a close-minded zealot I am not.

Perhaps if you'd free yourself from your foam-at-the mouth, unbridled zealotry in ideas that are only successful at being FALSIFIED by the scientific method (Austrian Economics -the quentissential oxymoron if ever I heard of one - lol) and your obvious need for validation by brain-fuzzy, obsequious, intellectual sycophants, you might get somewhere in life.....
 
If you claim I'm pretentious
Your post before last proved my point. Your 5 or 6 posts in repetition about a court case yesterday, proves my point.

I may be insecure, and you appear to be insecure. But it's very dishonest to berate popeye for the same sort of behavior you exhibit. He is at least capable at times of lowering the volume, speaking soulfully and with humility.
 
In the sense it is organized, sure.

Millions of people have read Atlas Shrugged. A significantly smaller # are Objectivists, which is the philosophical group based around the ideas in the book.

I don't conflate the bible with the church, or God with praying.


Science and modern collectivism (environmentalism, democracy, socialism) are the new means to control people. Instead of giving them a specific moral ethic, you propose multiple conflicting ones, and undermine critical thinkers as kooks or conspiracists.

Power is always in high demand, and so the methods of attaining it are always evolving.

Religion is something that can be good or evil, the entire enterprise is founded on interpretation.

But just like a bank robber drinking a coca cola doesn't make coke a crime enabling drug, nor does a priest diddling young boys make the bible a manual on child sexual abuse.

By being open minded, I mean making two logical progressions when you come to a conclusion. Instead of taking the first answer given, ask the question a second time, and this time question that first answer's veracity.

Most people believe what they are told. That is why flogs work. If they took the step of analyzing the flog, many would not convert.

Point well taken here Guerilla.


"Beware when the great God lets loose a thinker on this planer." -Ralph Waldo Emerson


"When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad, but they are always blind." -Bill Moyers


"It is an unscrupulous intellect that does not pay antiquity it's due reverence." -Eramus


“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”- Schopenhauer


Unfortunately it seems that the majority or our species is just wired this way. As we gain more knowledge we seem to just find more complicated ways to implement our base desires/drives.


Sincerely,

MT
 
I totally think there is something to the Book of Revelation. I have studied the Bible my whole life and have found too many prophesies and pieces in there that just fit too tightly to simply discard Revelation as being merely a story. Sure there are plenty of pieces in the Bible that may not make sense or may not fit our current paradigm, but I'm not stupid enough to throw the whole thing out simply because certain parts are off or misrepresented.

Anybody who has made it their mission to really grasp a true understanding of our reality and studied things like the Holocaust, communism, secret societies, mind control, Cain, Noah's sons, Israel, banking, the Federal Reserve, history, symbols, physics and even ETs should be aware that there is definitely more to this than we are led to believe.

I don't see how anybody could NOT reach the conclusion that we are headed towards a one world government based off the world's current affairs. It's all been planned for many years and we have all been slowly led into this system step by step. What we make of this is open to lots of different interpretations, but the fact of the matter is that it is well on the way.

I could go on for days about this subject, there's just way too much out there that nobody takes the time to look into, but that's okay, that too was prophesied.
 
Insightful as always MT - I am going to package all your threads and sell them as an ebook, lol...

.
.
.
.

OK, soap box proclamations over! Now I am off to build a landing page which I'll use to sell the Midas Touch ebook I'm about to push, lol

"I'll be here sitting on the beach while you do that, collecting my meager 20% licensing fee!!" My PayPal ID is midastouch@thegoldcoast.com. LOL!!!

By the way, while reading your post I reached up on my desk and pulled this down:

Discover200dpi001.jpg



Firstpage001.jpg


Sincerely,

MT

P.S. Let me know how my/your/our launch goes!! LOL!!!!
 
"I'm not an atheist. I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws."

This was written by Albert Einstein and sums up the whole god thing to me so perfect. I am open to almost anything when it comes to the idea of a god. This is because we as humans, can only hope to scratch the surface of understanding when it comes to the universe and our existance.
 
Religion is quite possibly the most brutal and unrelenting rebill/continuity program ever conceived.

You get hit up every Sunday, and get the goods when you're dead.

There's something to Revelation??? LMAO

Yea there was also something to the revolutions that democratized the entire fucking western world centuries ago, and believe me it wasn't the KING JAMES version that suddenly did it either.
 
The Book of Revelation only made it into the Bible by 1 vote - so it was a close call. The Book of Enoch, revered for many years, did not make the cut and was not included in the Canon. In Revelation, there were references to Nero, who killed many Christians; and references to Mass. Perhaps visions into the future are also included.

I do believe God can give a person a vision ... a religious experience. It has happened many times in history. This does not mean the person is mentally ill or on dope.
 
Religion is quite possibly the most brutal and unrelenting rebill/continuity program ever conceived.

You get hit up every Sunday, and get the goods when you're dead.

There's something to Revelation??? LMAO

Yea there was also something to the revolutions that democratized the entire fucking western world centuries ago, and believe me it wasn't the KING JAMES version that suddenly did it either.

I find it elementary how you express religion and religious beliefs as a way of discrediting the Book of Revelation. Would it not be much more beneficial to argue on actual points from Revelation rather than escaping with the straw man of religion? Are you so shallow as to not realize that the Bible has been misrepresented for ages? The topic is not about religion but rather the Book of Revelation. I am not in the lease bit surprised as so many people choose to take this stance rather than work off the actual source material itself.
 
What about the book of revelations?


Hard for a Christian to understand, let alone a Atheist or such.

The problem is , many people see them just as stories, I see them as books written thousands of years ago on the best knowledge.


If you saw a car 4000 years how would you describe it? How could you describe something if you could see 1000 years into the future? I imagine it'd be quite hard , If you're into all this stuff, read the book of Isaiah Too , there's quite a bit in there that's pretty scary if you don't say to yourself "Well this all can't be true" and are a little more open-minded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.