For some reason I thought this thread was going to be about the TV show, haha.
Me too

:R:
For some reason I thought this thread was going to be about the TV show, haha.
For some reason I thought this thread was going to be about the TV show, haha.
I dont give a fuck about "freebie whores" or whatever.
I send a legit lead - pay me. Simple.
Like Slightly Shady says - if the advertiser cannot afford the payout do not offer it as a carrot to get a load of pubs on board.
I would much rather run a biz op at $25 on the understanding that I was not going to get fucked two days into the campaign.
That's entirely fiction. I think everyone here as seen scrubs kick in long before there was time to gauge the traffic quality.
If you can't afford the payout, don't offer it.
End of business day #1 to offer, 10pm: convo rate above 22%
Starting at 7am next day: 1-2%, and continued thru the day.
XMCP is right.
They are verifying the submitted data for correctness and most likely to prevent duplicates. You can't take one extreme or the other and expect the CPA model to work. The advertiser has to pay out reasonably on conversions while the publisher has to understand that there are such things as fraud, duplicate data and "free trial" whores who affect the performance of a particular offer.
I dont give a fuck about "freebie whores" or whatever.
I send a legit lead - pay me. Simple.
Like Slightly Shady says - if the advertiser cannot afford the payout do not offer it as a carrot to get a load of pubs on board.
I would much rather run a biz op at $25 on the understanding that I was not going to get fucked two days into the campaign.
We really need a new wave of advertisers that can actually remain scrubless, and simply pay less. As someone has mentioned, I would be fine on getting paid less if I knew that I won't have 50-70% fluctuations. Fucks me up so badly.
And how is that my fucking problem?
If shit my end doesn't 'back out' (ie. isn't profitable) I don't expect the merchant to compensate me so - it's not hius problem. Why should it work the other way around?
And how is that my fucking problem?
If shit my end doesn't 'back out' (ie. isn't profitable) I don't expect the merchant to compensate me so - it's not hius problem. Why should it work the other way around?
I dont give a fuck about "freebie whores" or whatever.
I send a legit lead - pay me. Simple.
Like Slightly Shady says - if the advertiser cannot afford the payout do not offer it as a carrot to get a load of pubs on board.
I would much rather run a biz op at $25 on the understanding that I was not going to get fucked two days into the campaign.
It is your fucking problem because THEY ARE PAYING YOU FOR A SERVICE and you are failing to provide that service if the leads you provide are dupes/fakes or if your customers turn out to be fraudsters/scammers who have no genuine interest in the product.
You can promote your offers however you see fit and it will have some cost attached to it, but you should not expect to be compensated for mediocrity, so if you are spending your money or wasting your time conning people into completing the offer (and not actually SELLING them on the product/service) you can expect to be scrubbed and wiped out of most of your earnings. QQ moar!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just letting others know- getting the word out to those who dont know.shit like this happens. QQing will do nothing. adapt or GTFO