When they wanted to build a mosque at Ground Zero, Obama bent over backwards to assert their right to build it under freedom of religion. All we heard from the dumbfuck libs here was "It's their right!!! ZOMGG!!!"
Ignoring the fact that no one wanted to "build a mosque at Ground zero" for now...
By "libs" I assume that refers to "liberals" in the modern political sense, rather than a libertarian or philosophical liberal, or whatever.
I am not a political liberal, but I find it interesting when "liberals" are the ones supporting rights, especially property rights.
I'm curious what "conservatives" stand for these days? I know they give lip-service to property rights, but that's obviously not the case.
Modern conservatives appear to be "anti-" a lot of things, especially anti-individual, anti-Constitution ( except when occasionally convenient), anti-property rights, anti-small business.. while embracing big government statism, perpetual wars on multiple fronts ( mostly against US citizens on US soil).
Fuck, "liberals" are terrible, but at least they seem pretty upfront about it and a little more consistent.
The correct "conservative' approach to the "mosque", of course, would be to let the property owner develop the property as he/she/it sees fit and conduct business there how they want and associate with whomever they please.
Of course that would also be the correct "liberal" approach because it is the correct human/"American" approach.
Frankly, I'm about fucking sick of all the anti-American conservatives and fascists masquerading as conservative patriots.