Read Antifragile. I think you will really like it.
The thing is taleb isn't taken too seriously...quants and economists are well aware of the limitations of their models but use them as starting point or to help explain existing phenomena.
Read Antifragile. I think you will really like it.
You have to love this. Mtgox opens up, BTC pushes past $100. Now Mtgox goes down and the prices drop down to $68. Who wants a currency that is so dependable on whether an exchange site is up or not?
You guys are gay. I've been fighting Lukegay on this whole subject for months and the same shit I've been saying for months gets repeated here...
![]()
I hate you all
Stop posting.
Ok, I am in no position to defend Taleb, but can you tell me where he is "pretending to make some profound point"?It is hard to take Taleb seriously when he posts articles like this one and tries to pretend he's making some profound point.
You are aware that the audience at Wired is probably not exclusively people who understand statistics and probability?Anybody with a basic understanding of probability and statistics is aware of the kind errors he's talking about
Not Javascript, that's a Java exploit that's been around for 3-4 years+. I think most news institutions have reported on it at least a year ago. For the people that fall for that, losing some BTC is the least of their worries, you can install any software you want and therefore have access to everything they do on their computer. Not to mention that the Java exploit's fairly obtrusive, there are much more subtle exploits out there.Someone loses 34 BTC due to a javascript injection on a phony site:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=173227.0