I ain't got time for that. I'll stick to my big in your face graph.
Insofar as computers are machines, I think Hazlitt addressed this pretty well here.
A computer can't run a business and it won't be able to do it for a long, long time. Most of the scientist involved in AI, in one way or another, say we don't even know how to approach the problem. Computation is VERY different from a thought.
Jobs that don't require any expertise at all are on the way out. Cutting the number of medium-level expertise ones is next on the agenda.
It sounds really scary and it may seem like the robots are taking over, but I think the reality will be FAR from that. Just think about it. This already happened. It was called industrialization. Science did its thing and we figured a way to get things done WAY more efficiently. We changed manual labor for machines. This created hunger for new job types - machine engineers, mathematicians, maintenance and a lot more. This created a shift towards service-base economies. Virtually all of the developed economies in the world are heavily service-based.
Same thing will happen now - new job types will be created and they will need services too. I think the sector which the majority would flock to, will be social sciences. More people to analyze history, language, society, philosophy, theology, human psychology, anthropology, political sciences, economic sciences, law. More teachers, doctors. More writers, painters, musicians. Nature sciences probably will benefit a lot too - marine biology, ecology, forestry, agronomy. Data science helps all of them immensely.
I think great prosperity lies ahead for humanity, as a result of the great achievements in exact sciences in the past 200 years. (or skynet)
I think the problem is that Jerry insinuated (perhaps unintentionally?) that the dwindling middle class is the direct result of the wealthy's tendency to hoard their riches instead of distributing it among the proletarians.
My question is this:
WHY is there a widening income gap in America? I'm not an expert, but I've read enough material and have enough empirical evidence to convince me the middle class really IS disappearing.
But why? What factors are contributing to this? Crony capitalism? Burdensome taxation? The debasing of the US dollar? lol
I'm definitely interested in a libertarian perspective on this.
Because people suck at working. They treat working at mcdonalds like a career. These kids and such babied pussies. They dont' understand what hard work is. They have no pride, they have no knowledge, they have no skills.
Because people suck at working. They treat working at mcdonalds like a career. These kids and such babied pussies. They dont' understand what hard work is. They have no pride, they have no knowledge, they have no skills.
Productivity has gone up.
Is this a result of the kind of work overpaid CEOs do, or is this generation of workers inherently more productive than their predeccesors?
I'm guessing it's the former, but you probably think that the latter should get rewarded for it, huh?
All economic growth in an economy comes from technological advancements. As a result, the average productivity per person increases.
What about investment?
Mr. Billionaire is not spending all that dough he is hording on your campaigns...
Those six hoarding all that wealth does wonders for our economy. Why let some of that go to the workers and actually increase demand for goods and stimulate the economy...
Meanwhile, everyone has less to spend on goods thanks to these sociopathic hoarders...
Hoarding that kind of obscene wealth, rather than distribute a good chunk of it to the workers who actually create wealth..
Productivity has gone up.
Workers are working more hours at their jobs
I don't follow
If all economic growth comes from technology, then it follows that capital investment doesn't matter. That doesn't seem likely to me. What do you think?
R&D, production, distribution, sales & marketing, and customer support takes capital to generate?