Collapse of Middle Class Wealth

Setting aside the notion that peasant-like Walmart peons would have better ideas on how to invest 90 billion than a family that built an empire, you seem to have this bizarre obsession with what other people do with the money they've earned.

Newsflash, turd: if your bank account is above $0, if you own any assets right now, you are by your definition "hoarding your wealth".

You have no right to somebody else's money. In fact, you have no right to even talk about what they do with their money. To merely voice the idea reeks of communism, and how the collective can better determine the allocation of assets than the individual.

You've been brainwashed by the same people who think there is a finite supply of money in the world, as opposed to understanding that wealth is created when you provide ADDED VALUE. The Waltons did that(albeit with shoddy Chinese slave labor, but that is a discussion for another day) and thereby created wealth for themselves, in addition to thousands of jobs for American citizens.

Wealth is not finite. If you buy an apple from Guatamala for $1 and sell it in Cali for $3, you just created wealth.

Go crawl back down your envious, penniless hole that you came from. You didn't earn the Waltons fortune - they did. You will not make any decisions on what they do with it - they will.

Perhaps when Comrade Obama completes his coup and we line the Waltons up against the wall as we shout "Death to the bourgeoisie!", then you will see your dream fulfilled. Until then, perhaps you should mosey on over to North Korea or Cuba where no private businessmen are allowed to "hoard" their wealth and everyone lives in equal squalor and misery.

Oh this is good stuff. The assumptions made in this post are too funny. Is it a case of you don't know or that you don't know that you don't know. I think with you it's the latter.
 


Oh this is good stuff. The assumptions made in this post are too funny. Is it a case of you don't know or that you don't know that you don't know. I think with you it's the latter.

Everytime I get ready to read one of your posts, I cue this song up:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0U3V00h8tnk=embed[/ame]

Like a dull knife
Just ain't cutting
Just talking loud
Then saying nothing
Just saying nothing
Just saying nothing

You can't tell me
How to run my life down
You can't tell me
How to keep my business sound
You can't tell me
What I'm doing wrong
When you keep driving and
Singing that same old money song
You can't tell me
Which way to go
Cause three times seven
And then some more
You can't tell me, hey

You're like a dull knife
Just ain't cutting
You're just talking loud
And saying nothing
Just saying nothing
Just saying nothing

Don't tell me
How to do my thing
When you can't, can't
Can't do your own
Dont tell me how to be a boy
When, when you know I'm grown
Can't use me like a woman
Woman throws away her dress
And you can't tell me, hey
How to use my mess

You're like a dull knife
Jack, you just ain't cutting
You're just talking loud
Then saying nothing
Just saying nothing
And saying nothing

Shape up your bag
Don't worry bout mine
My thing together
And a doing fine

Good luck to you
Just allow you're wrong
Then keep on singing that
Same old money song

Then keep on singing that
Same old money song
Just keep on singing that
Same old money song

Just keep on singing that
Same old money song
Just keep on singing that
Same old money, oww

I got to, I want yo
I musta, I got to
Ashes ashes and a dust to dust
I musta, jump on back
I'm doing a, my hands

I say I will, the point
Is too dark to fill
You say I cant
You're phony, you're phony
I said, I said, you're phony
 
If you would put the same energy into making something of yourself as you have in being jealous of those that have what you don’t you could be an asset to this society instead of a sponge.

LOL. Love all the language like "jealous" and "sponge" etc. If it makes you feel better. But the reality is that the sponges that you are so against are often the richest people out there. Oh, yes, their companies gets fat subsidies and corporate welfare, pay lower effective tax rates than the middle class, and siphon off an insane amount of surplus labor value through increasingly anti-worker laws they get passed by buying Congressmen off with the gazillion dollars they spend on lobbying.

And you call me a sponge? hahahaha. Dude, if you were to open your eyes and see how billionaires get their money, you'd change your tune. In your mind they got it by rolling up their sleeves and playing fair in a free market of labor and capital. To you they are a bunch of Buffets. However, if you were to actually become an informed individual, you'd realize that these rich people are taking money from the middle class and workers to get rich. They aren't getting rich by exclusively creating new wealth out of thin air. You think it's a coincidence that as unions have declined, anti-workers laws have increased, offshoring has blown up that the rich have gotten richer while the middle class has gotten poorer?
 
Everytime I get ready to read one of your posts, I cue this song up:

When a post is so dumb and full of so many factually incorrect assumptions as was MHunter's post, I can't be bothered to dissect it line by line.

It's like someone posting that humans are green and tables talk. Would you really expect for someone to get into a lengthy discussion showing them how wrong they are? Or would you just chuckle and let them live in their fantasy world?
 
My parents weren't perfect by any stretch, but I count myself lucky they didn't teach me to hate the rich. It seems like a miserable existence.
 
sa-121.gif


cjsFkoT.jpg
 
why are so many of you even wasting your time replying to this with logic? this is just generic liberal gibberish, their brains are unable of comprehending logic or thinking multiple steps ahead so there is no use using arguments that rely on these skills because they won't understand what you're saying anyway, nor will they be willing to do any relevant amount of research into the subject matter or put any effort into proposing viable solutions that wouldn't destroy the economy

exhibit A) jerry brings up a problem. multiple intelligent wickedfirers ask him for his solution to the problem. instead of responding with a solution, he has a bag full of excuses as to why he can't come up with a solution.

exhibit B) when i was 18 i had $4k in my bank account. now i have over 100x that. in another 10 years, i plan to have worked hard enough to have 100x what i have now. if you really think there is no upwards mobility in this country, suck my dick.

liberals sometimes remind me of the homeowners association in my neighborhood: people with nothing better to do, who already know they have failed at life, so they go around making silly rules and trying to tell everyone what to do in order to make themselves feel like they have a purpose

(by "liberals" i'm referring to the far leftists whose minds are unable to understand why 90% tax rates and socialist fiscal policies don't work, not reasonable liberals who are actually somewhat educated/intelligent and are more interested in social policies - if you're a lib for the social stuff, that's perfectly fine and the above doesn't refer to you)
 
R&D, production, distribution, sales & marketing, and customer support takes capital to generate?

Yes, of course.

Technological advancement is Growth. With static supply and demand being constant (whether it be for goods or space) there will be no growth. In a competitive economy they will be unable to lower prices, so funding new businesses will just take a chunk out of the existing market. The reason companies do R&D is to develop technologies for greater/more efficient production.

This isn't a new concept.
 
However, if you were to actually become an informed individual, you'd realize that these rich people are taking money from the middle class and workers to get rich.

Ok, but then why don't you get pissed off at the poor people for accepting the oh-so-shitty wages and working conditions? If everyone refused to work at Walmart, then Walmart would do what's necessary to attract workers. They don't seem to have a problem with hiring new employees though. Aren't the workers to blame just as much if not more than the wealthy CEO who's just doing what he/she can to run their business as efficiently as possible?
 
The dwindling middle class is a direct result of the middle class blowing their money on flat screen tv's, dining out, x-box's for their kids, new cadillac SUV's that get 12mpg and all the other bullshit people waste their money on.

People make enough money its just how they spend it. People in poverty are the worst about it.

Honestly, this response is a little too simple for me. There must be more factors than simply rampant consumerism and consumer debt.

Does monetary inflation play a part? What about corporate wellfare that stifles competition? Increased taxation?

Time for me to do some homework.
 
Honestly, this response is a little too simple for me. There must be more factors than simply rampant consumerism and consumer debt.

Does monetary inflation play a part? What about corporate wellfare that stifles competition? Increased taxation?

Time for me to do some homework.

Yes.

Inflation plays a huge part. Artificially low interest rates, fiat currency, corporate bailouts, etc etc.

Also the culture of going into six-figures of debt to go to college. That the American dream is to "own" a home, no matter the massive financial burden involved. The easy access to consumer credit to buy $800 phones and $40,000 cars to people who can't afford it.

Regulations, licensing, taxes and fines injected into every aspect of our lives.

One example, I recently had an infection. I was prescribed antibiotics. The pharmacist told me that a year ago it'd be $4. It was $200 for a 10-day supply.

The increasingly militarized police state. The military industrial complex and perpetual wars. Being forced to purchase shitty products at gun-point (health insurance).

Invasive bureaucratic intrusion into every aspect of our lives. You have to pay for other people's kids to go to youth indoctrination camps. You have to pay into social security - and if you're younger than 40 the odds of you getting any return on that forced investment are laughable. You can't drink water or wipe your ass without shelling out money to the state.

Your internet and cell phone are state sanctioned monopolies. There's no market competition. No competing on price or service, you pay what they demand or you don't get service. And that applies to everything from energy to automobiles.

In India, you can buy a brand new car for $2,500. Never going to happen here due to regulations.

I could go on about the state all day.

In fairness, people are idiots when it comes to finances. But if you eliminate state intervention, they could be free to be idiots and still do just fine.
 
Technological advancement is Growth. With static supply and demand being constant (whether it be for goods or space) there will be no growth. In a competitive economy they will be unable to lower prices, so funding new businesses will just take a chunk out of the existing market. The reason companies do R&D is to develop technologies for greater/more efficient production.

This isn't a new concept.

Say population increases by 10%, supply and demand can both increase without a change in technology.
 
We need to decentralize the legislative system. Get rid of representatives entirely and let people vote via the internet. No one to bribe and everyone gets the same voice. Problem solved.