Free Obama Money



That's what my ex would do when she knew she had made a logical fallacy. "I'm ending this discussion, now!"



riddarhusetgal said:
You have no credentials and no credibility among those recognized by their peers as knowledgeable - why do you continue to speak as if you do?

Notice I said peers and not "random posters on an Internet Marketing Forum".

@papajohn...I usually just glance over your loquacious epithets - accept when they include expletives that actually are a little alluring....

To answer your question I have PEER REVIEWED RESEARCH to support what I am saying. You do know the difference between random forum posts and "PEER REVIEWED" RESEARCH DON'T YOU?

If you ever want to start a thread that includes substantive academic research do let me know. And by the way, thanks for the regular negative rep love taps - you know how to make a girl feel special, lol

I'm ending the conversation now.
Click to expand...
 
riddarhusetgal's posts are only worth reading if you keep reminding yourself, "This is satire."

Then they're kinda funny. But only kinda. And honestly riddarhusetgal, as far as satire goes, this is not your best work.

Your fan,

Jake
 
riddarhuset is a feminist .i told you guys weeks ago never let a feminist criticize your leadership

from my observation the only down to earth women on this forum are turbolapp, phillian and busyni if she's still keeping it real .
 
riddarhusetgal said:
'
MONEY TALKS AND BULLSHIT WALKS. THAT'S THE NATURE OF C.A.P.A.T.A.L.I.S.M buddy

Maybe if you spent more time reading this and listening to fools you'd get someplace in life:

2009 World Wealth Report: While World Wealth and High Net Worth Population shrink below 2005 levels, overall HNWI wealth expected to grow at annual rate of 8.1% by 2013.

2009 World Wealth Report
Click to expand...

I love when you get really excited and start to use bigger font sizes and pretty colors.
 
guerilla said:
Even if it was true, it is still an appeal to authority (specific type of non sequitur). A logical fallacy based on the proposition that by virtue of his expertise in one field, Buffet is infallible in all fields.

It's like saying, "Einstein said X, and Einstein was a genius, therefore X is true because Einstein (a genius) said it."

This sort of flawed reasoning is typical in people incapable of doing much more than repeating what they have heard or learned by rote. Basically, these are your target customers in AM. People who repeat what they are told by someone they regard as an authority (Obama, Bush, Oprah, Buffet, Gates etc) and display little skepticism or intellectual inquiry of their own.
Click to expand...

Maybe I'm missing something, but did you really expect a deep intellectual exchange about whether or not the video accurately represents a scientifically selected sample of all Obama supporters? If that's actually an argument in question, then that would be an anecdotal fallacy to begin with.
 
They all need...........

0410sr-dea.jpg


_________________________
http://www.wickedfire.com/sell-buy-trade/87156-50-discount-submission-service.html

Search Engine Marketing Firm
 
Moxie said:
Maybe I'm missing something, but did you really expect a deep intellectual exchange about whether or not the video accurately represents a scientifically selected sample of all Obama supporters?
Click to expand...
I did not comment on the video. So yeah, you missed something.
 
lmao at all these political know-it-alls..

The saddest part about the people you see in ALL these videos is how misled and
confused they are, how blindly they follow, and how little they seem to know about
politics, economics, and the real world (out there). Whether they're supporting Palin or Obama, you don't have to go far to find a bunch of dumb nitwits.

Why do people cling to their fanatical viewpoints so tightly, and demonize anyone with a different opinion?
 
guerilla said:
I did not comment on the video. So yeah, you missed something.
Click to expand...

I was talking about your apparent request for a certain standard of logical discourse in what I viewed as just another semi-ridiculous internet message board discussion and not an exploration to objectively establish facts. Who Warren Buffett voted for would basically be meaningless for researchers trying to logically and accurately determine the median income or IQ levels of Obama voters. So would probably everything else in this thread though, so I never got the impression that anyone was really trying to scientifically prove anything. :jester:
 
Moxie said:
so I never got the impression that anyone was really trying to scientifically prove anything. :jester:
Click to expand...
Then you didn't read Riddar's posts where she claimed scientific and logical supremacy while making statements that are demonstrably fallacious.

You may not have thought the conversation was serious, but she obviously did. And I just pointed out, that her seriousness was eroded by her lack of a quality argument.

I agree, the whole discussion is somewhat silly because it is collectivistic. But it was made even more silly by someone screaming about how righteous they were on intellectual grounds, while making an anti-intellectual argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom