Global Warming now officially bullshit
- Thread starter hellblazer
- Start date
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOLT8ECko6g"]YouTube - Al Gore, Liar: The Global Warming God Dosen't Want Tough Questions! Brainwashing![/ame]
There's been a lot of scientists that have called it out, the problem is you don't see them on national news most the the time. They have been fighting this since it ever surfaced.
The 7' of snow in my yard two winters ago and the 4 straight weeks of sub freezing temps last winter say global warming is not an immediate threat.
I would like to take money from oil companies.
I would like to take money from oil companies.
Good video...
And yeah I agree with Grindstone. About 3 years ago I needed the snow taken away from my driveway three times...
...Last winter I needed it done 22. AND I needed it done a few weeks ago after we got around 6 inches of snow.
And yeah I agree with Grindstone. About 3 years ago I needed the snow taken away from my driveway three times...
...Last winter I needed it done 22. AND I needed it done a few weeks ago after we got around 6 inches of snow.
It's always good to be reassured that American News suck balls, which is why I only read Swiss news.
Any of you guys actually know what the fact that the there is an increase of heat radiation means?
Energy radiation is a function of heat contained in the object. So if radiation output is increasing, heat contained is increasing.
Also, did you happen to notice that there were NO references what so ever from whom those other Graphs came? He says they were from the "groupthink" and "consensus".
Sure I bet ALL other scientists were completely wrong in using a fairly simple principle that when something gets warmer, it radiates more heat. OR, maybe they just made up some bullshit graphs.
I have to say Glenn Beck is a genius at using the under education of Americans to his advantage.
Any of you guys actually know what the fact that the there is an increase of heat radiation means?
Energy radiation is a function of heat contained in the object. So if radiation output is increasing, heat contained is increasing.
Also, did you happen to notice that there were NO references what so ever from whom those other Graphs came? He says they were from the "groupthink" and "consensus".
Sure I bet ALL other scientists were completely wrong in using a fairly simple principle that when something gets warmer, it radiates more heat. OR, maybe they just made up some bullshit graphs.
I have to say Glenn Beck is a genius at using the under education of Americans to his advantage.
Looks like I need to create a rebill product targeted at paranoid Glenn Beck fans, and a product targeted at raging liberals. The lack of independent thinking on both sides is giving me some pretty good ideas...
But yet you "wana be" progressives will watch a comedy show (Jon Stewart) for your news! LOL.....why do you kids think that being left is so "hip"?
You need to watch his show more. He debunks most of these conspiraces on his show. Really watch the show before you take what maddow and colbert have to say, to heart.
How can Beck be a christian and a mormon? christians think mormons are wackjobs and mormons think ... well ... I won't even go there.
Not really, when there's not a creditable source why waste time reading/watching it?
So because I don't like Glenn Beck I am a left wing nut job who gives frequent BJ's to John Stewart?
If I lived in the states, which I don't, I wouldn't have voted for Obama. (All hype no game - as we've only started to see.)
I don't like 50 cent - but I still like music. I don't like Glenn Beck - but I still like the party he supports more then their opponent.
Because it is based on provable facts. If a less than credible source tells you the earth is round, are you going to refuse to believe them due to your prejudices against them?
It's asinine to claim you would flat out refuse to believe something without seeing some 3rd party evidence.
I thought libs all had 'open minds' ... guess not.
How is GB not credible. Almost everything that he talks about on his show is backed with video tape or other evidence. Sure some of his conspiraces are a litte wild at times but he backs up his claims moreso than ANY other comentator on tv.
Does the hacks on MSNBC provide evidence of any kind. NOPE! they just blast off at the mouth and hope the sheeple that watch (all 10 of them) will blindly follow.
Most libs hate Beck for one reason.........he is not a lib.
They have to find the money for research from somewhere. The government, Al Gore and and global corps has too much money to lose to be funding research that debunks thier claims.
You think that Gore is going to throw away 10 years of of his lifes work, nobel prize, cable network and millions of dollars even if he knew global warming was bogus?. Do you think the scientist are going to admit that they were wrong all along? Do you think global corps like GE, who have invested billions of dollars are going to throw away thier investments now? Are the world governments and the UN going to to throw away the chance to milk the western countries of billions of dollars in environmental taxes?
Nope! they will keep lying and pointing to the false data. It's all about power and money.
Does anyone find it ironic/weird/maybe hypocritical that FOX news is so conservative while their entertainment programming is so liberal. (Simpsons, Family Guy, on and on....)
They spout all these "values" while at the same time they are liberal as all hell with their entertainment programming.
It's simply because they want to make profit, obviously, but damn. The only reason FOX is conservative at all is probably because there weren't any other conservative channels on tv and they saw that void and filled it.
If all the channels before FOX were conservative then FOX would have filled the void and been liberal. Profit, profit, profit, not "values".
Every station is the same however, they are all biased towards whatever audience they are targetting. So in reality no station has a liberal or a conservative bias first and foremost they have a profit motive bias. They slant the news towards whatever makes them the most money.
This is also why I believe PBS and NPR kick all ass because they lack a profit motive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent:_The_Political_Economy_of_the_Mass_Media
They spout all these "values" while at the same time they are liberal as all hell with their entertainment programming.
It's simply because they want to make profit, obviously, but damn. The only reason FOX is conservative at all is probably because there weren't any other conservative channels on tv and they saw that void and filled it.
If all the channels before FOX were conservative then FOX would have filled the void and been liberal. Profit, profit, profit, not "values".
Every station is the same however, they are all biased towards whatever audience they are targetting. So in reality no station has a liberal or a conservative bias first and foremost they have a profit motive bias. They slant the news towards whatever makes them the most money.
This is also why I believe PBS and NPR kick all ass because they lack a profit motive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent:_The_Political_Economy_of_the_Mass_Media