Is there a 'best before date' for women?

Your_Pal said:
So you are fine if she is second or third hand. I mean how on the earth you can make a trustworthy relationship with a girl whom you know is already fucked by 2 other dicks. I don't know how American culture accept it but here in India if there is a situation like this it would be a straight up divorce (Not 100% but yeah no one actually would love to live with such a girl)

It doesn't really matter ""too many penises dipped in". If a girl has more than 1 physical relationship I would say you can NEVER trust the bitch in entire life. The other day she would cheat on you. You won't ever have strong and trustworthy relationship.
Click to expand...

I don't like to set standards I can't meet myself. Not just in relationships, but in all walks of life. What does having sex when single have to do with trust in a relationship? I am one hell of a slut when I'm single, but I have never even considered cheating when in a relationship. If I felt the need to cheat I would end the relationship and that's that. It's retarded to assume that anyone who has had sex with another will cheat on you.
 


relevant

aRXCk.jpg
 
This thread = very enlightening. I hadn't realized how many WickedFire members live in the turd world. The dudes who post the most graphic porn pics have convinced themselves that only a virgin will do when it comes to marriage. News flash: you're in for about fifty years of fucking torture if all you're going to do is marry a "mother" figure. What the fuck does it matter if she can cook or not? Why can't you cook? Are you a retard? What the fuck does it matter whether she wants to wipe your diapers for you and praise you all the time? Are you such a small, emotionally deranged fuckhead that you cease to exist without a mommy figure praising you 24/7?

Believe me, you don't want a woman who doesn't know who she is, who isn't educated and accomplished in her own career. In the beginning a domestic slave sounds like a nice idea. It's attractive for about fifty minutes into a marriage. You will bore yourself shitless dealing with a woman who has no mind, no will, and no creative drive of her own.

And if she knows what to do with a penis when she sees one, the blowjobs are all the better. If she loves you enough she'll be willing to give them to you even when you're wrinkled, flabby, and 80. And you should be grateful, not hateful because she's gotten older. Think you won't get older? Think that you can buy a woman's affection when you're 75 and it won't feel like you're paying a cold-hearted whore for her time? Think again. A partner in life is a partner who shares your sensibility, your willingness to grow and evolve and change over time. That's what's sexy. Wrinkles will happen. Fucking deal with it -- or just don't get married. It's pretty simple.

Of course, this is all a hell of a lot easier when both you and she are childfree by choice. Then you can just genuinely enjoying being people, without the pressure of presenting a DNA replicant to your extended family. (As if that even matters anymore unless you're fucking Prince William and you have an empire to bequeath to your progeny. Who the fuck do you think you are, that you feel that a woman's only purpose in joining you for life is to produce your kids and be a wet nurse all the time to your sperm? Is that really what guys here think? I have to think you're trolling. If so, well played, my friends. Well played. I almost fell for it.)
 
^I think it's very sad that appreciating women for their nurturing qualities has become some sort of social faux pas.

It has nothing to do with wanting a second mom, that's a pretty disturbed way of thinking bro.
 
guys let's admit that we gay webmasters are hypocrites.. we want women to have all the sexy feminine qualities (young, nice boobs, virgin, firm ass, tight pussy, nice skin and hair, etc...) but whenever we meet women that apply the same standards when they look for men (athletic, tall, well endowed, full hair, etc..) we call them whores LOL
 
mituozo said:
The difference in miscarriages and defects between early 20's and 30's is actually pretty minimal, and often over stated.

Miscarriages:
naturalconceptin_en.gif


Birth defects:
figure1.gif


It's not until about age 40 that it's significantly different. You're talking 3.x% chance of birth defects in 20's vs 4.2% for 35+, which is negligable. Miscarriage is a 5% difference from age 22 to age 40.

A recent study also showed that people who have kids older in life age slower, too (although I've lost the link, I saw it a few days ago).

The only argument I can think for having kids when you're young is that you'll be more youthful as they grow up, so potentially will have more in common / be able to relate with their problems and so forth better.

The thing is though, our generation at age 70 will be probably equivalent in mobility to people aged 55-60 or so now. So even if you have kids aged 40, you're highly unlikely to die before they're of adult age and independent.
Click to expand...

Not entirely sure of the research on this and I don't have time to check now, but observation has shown that the older a woman is, the more trouble she has actually becoming pregnant - obviously not true for all women, but if you check fertility clinic use it's not the 25-year-olds taking advantage of science....

Regardless of age, adoption or fostering, parents who want their children and who love and treat them properly should have them. Mother Nature just makes that harder for some than other, usually distinguishing by age.
 
mituozo said:
Someone's personality stays with them for the rest of their life, looks fade.
Click to expand...

Compare the outlook of a typical 16 year old girl with a middle-aged woman and then an old woman.

While the basic temperament remains clearly there is a shift in demeanour that correlates with an aging body. Likely the middle-aged woman isn’t as chipper, unconditionally pleasant, and as forgiving as she once was (where it matters). She has become world-weary and more adept at extracting what she desires from others and the world around her. Without her youthful looks she is forced to be more pragmatic, and less concerned with enjoying the ride as time is limited.

As with looks you’re rolling the dice. Sweet pea may remain that way if you’re fortunate or slowly evolve into your worst nightmare. Sure, one’s actions as a husband plays a huge role but a bigger proportion than most want to accept is out of the man’s control.
 
Don't marry some yuppie girl. Find you a meek, gentle, kind spirited, country girl. If she knows how to cook and she carries her bible and she loves to eat bull frog, now there's a woman. See what I am saying. Just cause she looks a little homely that's all right. It's a hard to get a pretty one that cooks and carries a bible.
Duck Dynasty - Duck Dynasty: PHILosophies - Happiness - YouTube
The first prerequisite for a marrying a woman in my opinion: Can...She...Cook? You gonna be there for 50 years and you don't even know whether she can cook! What kinda thinking is that? Well, we'll just live off love. Not really, you'll starve to death.
 
mituozo said:
Yeah just realised, not had enough sleep, haha. It's the thread title that did it.

Either way, I think it's crazy to assume someone is mad because they were single in their late 20's or whatever. My parents got married when my mother was ~30 and my dad was 35. They've been fine.

There is some truth in the whole "people who sleep around" have worse marriages, though:

divorceriskbynumberofpartners1.jpg
Click to expand...
Where's the 20+ pink line for females. Graph is rigged. What! do they think that is starting to creep into hooker territory. I know a couple "Lady's" that would blow this chart away. There's a lot of free area to the right of 20+ on this graph.
 
Celebrator said:
Where's the 20+ pink line for females. Graph is rigged. What! do they think that is starting to creep into hooker territory. I know a couple "Lady's" that would blow this chart away. There's a lot of free area to the right of 20+ on this graph.
Click to expand...

I assume the survey size meant that no one answered with 20+. Most girls even if they have slept with 20+ people will never admit it in any form.
 
Me personally, I usually troll the playgrounds and middle schools.





























This is where I find single mothers, easy fucks brah.






mituozo said:
Man do some of you guys have a fucked up view of women.

When you're talking about marrying someone, you're making a commitment for the rest of your life. So why the fuck are you so concerned about how amazing they're going to look for what's probably going to be another 5-10 years or so? If that's your only concern in a woman you shouldn't be getting married at all.

If you're getting married, you should be looking for it to last another 40-50 years at least (until death do us part etc). If you're marrying someone and don't see this, or you're just concerned about their looks at the current time, or just want kids, then you're setting yourself up for one miserable life.

Someone's personality stays with them for the rest of their life, looks fade.

If you like the concept of marriage then focus on finding someone with similar life beliefs to you (i.e. where they want to live, whether they're a family person or not, what lifestyle they want to lead, etc..) rather than the hottest girl in the room. It's also important that you mutually respect, trust & support each other, so can give each other some space.
Click to expand...


7/10 only because I editing my post to quote you.
 
I'm 36 and if I met a woman of my own age and married her, I'd also be marrying her former life, her past.
Click to expand...
by Henry Rollins

^This for me.

I'm quite young yet, but if I'll end up alone in mid-30s, I'll probably stay alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: guerilla
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom