It was a mixed feeling of joy-anger when I read that.
I'm really not sure how I'd react if that were to really happen.
The vast majority of *ahem* "marketers" rely on sucking from the Google teat for traffic.
There are a handful of independent marketers that do well with SEO. The rest fight tooth and nail to rank for "long term keywords."
They're fine with fighting each other for scraps. They think that's how it's supposed to be.
If there was a huge changeup like this joke, some would get smart and go over to paid traffic and drive up click/media prices for people actually running a business.
The rest would flood the welfare lines.
lol SEO lol
Peasants spotted all day, everyday.
The vast majority of *ahem* "marketers" rely on sucking from the Google teat for traffic.
There are a handful of independent marketers that do well with SEO. The rest fight tooth and nail to rank for "long term keywords."
They're fine with fighting each other for scraps. They think that's how it's supposed to be.
If there was a huge changeup like this joke, some would get smart and go over to paid traffic and drive up click/media prices for people actually running a business.
The rest would flood the welfare lines.
lol SEO lol
Peasants spotted all day, everyday.
did you read matt cutts post in the given source?lolAround 2007 I quit SEO to do social media marketing and haven't looked back. From my experience, the problem with SEO is the initial investment and the lack of control. i made really good $ spamming facebook with next to nothing initial investment but in 2006 I spent thousands on blacklinks at best breaking even from the ad revenue, and then all my rankings vanished for apparently no reason.