Obama Intentionally Caused Ambassador's Death By Shutting Down Military Response



iPyh6.jpg
 
A huge part of Obama's money is coming from overseas. Correlation is not causation. What is it with "libertarians" and their simplistic inability to detect nuance?

The bottom line is that Obama caused the death of an ambassador by shutting down the default military response to an attack on U.S. soil. He should be impeached and imprisoned for his dereliction of duty as Commander in Chief. If he hadn't deliberately stepped in and prevented the military/spec ops from responding, the ambassador might still be alive.
 
The bottom line is that Obama caused the death of an ambassador by shutting down the default military response to an attack on U.S. soil.
George Bush did nothing about 9/11 for 39 minutes after being informed what was happening, allowing the attacks to finish.

Clinton bombed civilians in Bosnia.

Reagan was running drug cartels. Daddy Bush ginned up the first Iraq war.

Big deal. Every President is a criminal or war criminal.

Presidents are never held accountable.

I am looking forward to 4 more years of Obama and your delicious tears.
 
I have no horse in that race, just tidy it up. Less links, or neatened anchor text and layout could probably convey whatever you point is with more effectiveness.


yes, my sig is a little bit of a mess. Ill work on it in the near Future.
 
George Bush did nothing about 9/11 for 39 minutes after being informed what was happening, allowing the attacks to finish.

Clinton bombed civilians in Bosnia.

Reagan was running drug cartels. Daddy Bush ginned up the first Iraq war.

Big deal. Every President is a criminal or war criminal.

Presidents are never held accountable.

I am looking forward to 4 more years of Obama and your delicious tears.

They're not even remotely comparable. This was the first time in over 30 years that an ambassador was murdered. Obama deliberately stopped the only action that could have saved those men.

The truth will come out. As much as it might soothe the egos of "libertarians" to affect the jaded, whiny tone about how nothing matters and nothing changes, the American system, while flawed, still stands for justice. There will be hearings on this scandal. People will be held accountable.

Obama actively prevented the U.S. military from saving the lives of brave Americans and his evil deed must not go unpunished.
 
The bottom line is that Obama caused the death of an ambassador by shutting down the default military response to an attack on U.S. soil. He should be impeached and imprisoned for his dereliction of duty as Commander in Chief. If he hadn't deliberately stepped in and prevented the military/spec ops from responding, the ambassador might still be alive.

Why didn't you care about it when NDAA was signed into law making it legal to kill American citizens anywhere in the world (including US soil) without trial or conviction? It's only been used on Muslims Americans so far that we know of, but will you care if it's used to kill Christian Americans? What about when Romney ramps up the drones and targeted killings, which he has already promised to do? Will you care then?
 
The truth will come out. As much as it might soothe the egos of "libertarians" to affect the jaded, whiny tone about how nothing matters and nothing changes, the American system, while flawed, still stands for justice. There will be hearings on this scandal. People will be held accountable.
And if there isn't, then what?

I hope you come on this forum and cry like a baby.
 
Why didn't you care about it when NDAA was signed into law making it legal to kill American citizens anywhere in the world (including US soil) without trial or conviction? It's only been used on Muslims Americans so far that we know of, but will you care if it's used to kill Christian Americans? What about when Romney ramps up the drones and targeted killings, which he has already promised to do? Will you care then?

NDAA is a horrific piece of legislation that was passed under cover of darkness. It's also unconstitutional.

And if there isn't, then what?

I hope you come on this forum and cry like a baby.

And if there is, then what?

I'm sure you'll be nowhere to be found, except in the dark, musty corners where "libertarians" congregate and jerk each other off to the sweet thoughts of "false left-right paradigms" and how voting is meaningless.
 
Obsession can be dangerous, bro. Ask subigo, Unripe Arbiter, and luke.
In your dreams... I've actually found that harrassing you has lowered my blood pressure, a kind of stress relief. :thumbsup:


Should my sig. be Pro Obama then?
Of course not; it should be anti-politics.

Again, you gotta get your head out of the trap of the 2-party system. You're only giving more power to those that enslave you when you attack either a rebloodlican or a democrip.


A huge part of Obama's money is coming from overseas.
As is Romneys. Your point?

What is it with "libertarians" and their simplistic inability to detect nuance?
What is it with statists and their inability to detect that we have rejected their nuanced points as childish and don't wish to hurt their feelings by rubbing their noses in it?


The bottom line is that Obama caused the death of an ambassador by shutting down the default military response to an attack on U.S. soil. He should be impeached and imprisoned for his dereliction of duty as Commander in Chief. If he hadn't deliberately stepped in and prevented the military/spec ops from responding, the ambassador might still be alive.
We caught that part. Really.

It only sounds amazing to you though because you don't believe all the other evils we've tried to show you that the state does on a near-daily basis. It's as surprising to us as when you exhale after inhaling.


They're not even remotely comparable. This was the first time in over 30 years that an ambassador was murdered. Obama deliberately stopped the only action that could have saved those men.
Oh please. Seriously? It's just a few lives, dude. You can count them on one hand even.

How many lives did the AVERAGE president take while in office?

Answer: So damn many that a handful of lives for some political gain wouldn't cause him to even think about it.


The truth will come out... There will be hearings on this scandal. People will be held accountable.
If that were so, why would Rush be alone in reporting this? Surely the other news agencies have had the time now to check up on the story and run it too, right?

Hint: It might have something to do with the fact that the powers that be directly control mostly all of the world's media.

Stories, both true and lies, only "get out" with the compliance of the powers that be. I don't see any reason for TPTB to accept this story getting out like it was just a harmless blowjob. This will effect their plans and they won't be having any of that.



Obama actively prevented the U.S. military from saving the lives of brave Americans and his evil deed must not go unpunished.
I guess it's just up to you then. You know what you have to do.

Good luck, son. :thumbsup:
 
They don't mention this very much anymore, but the reason they were able to force Nixon to resign is because they used bigger fonts.
 
the trap of the 2-party system.

False left-right paradigm, brah.

As is Romneys. Your point?

It's a response to guerilla's rather ludicrous assertion that Goldman owns both candidates. Romney also hasn't set his website's donation system to accept any credit card without verification.

we have rejected their nuanced points

We caught that part.

all the other evils we've tried to show you

It's as surprising to us

Your continual references to "we" and "us" have not gotten any less creepy.

How many lives did the AVERAGE president take while in office?

This thread isn't about your list of grievances. It's about the President committing an impeachable offence worthy of prosecution. Pointing to bad behavior, real or imagined, to justify other bad behavior isn't going to fly.

why would Rush be alone in reporting this?

Maybe your computer monitor has been stuck on Russia Today; the media has been exploding with this story. I want the posters and lurkers here to witness you guys vomit up your predictable TPTB garbage, so that when this is understood and prosecuted for the scandal that it is, your woefully inaccurate paradigms will be exposed.

By "cover of darkness" you mean a public vote in congress, one where Republicans were much more in favor of it than Democrats?

By cover of darkness, I mean it was signed into law on New Year's Eve, a day when most Americans were getting blackout drunk, in addition to the fact that Obama specifically insisted on the controversial provision being inserted into the bill.
 
NDAA is a horrific piece of legislation that was passed under cover of darkness. It's also unconstitutional.

But your boy Romney has praised Obama for signing NDAA into law, and has vowed to use it even more than it's already being used.

...ludicrous assertion that Goldman owns both candidates.

Step 1 - go to OpenSecrets.org
Step 2 - look at the top donors for Obama in 2008
Step 3 - look at the top donors for Romney in 2012
Step 4 - you have now swallowed the red pill. Congratulations.