Fascinating "study", but
was it really needed when everyone already knows that roughly 11 of 12 footballs will routinely lose a noticeable amount of air pressure when exposed to an hour or two of 51 degree weather?
And Fill - please tell me that you believe the New England Patriots attempted one single field goal with an underinflated ball in the past 15 years. Just one.
-
To summate: the Pats got caught cheating. And stats conclusively indicate that cheating like this has been standard operating procedure for years.
Why is this so difficult to digest? Do you really need Richard Sherman spelling it out for you?
This Warren Sharp guy is outstanding (and in his words his work has given him "a perfect lesson on the
power of social media and sending a critical story “viral”."
His new work (just crunching numbers) ...
New England Patriots Fumble More Often When Playing for Other Teams
4 main points
1) Patriots players fumbled SIGNIFICANTLY more often when playing on other NFL teams than when playing for the Patriots:
2) The most utilized of the Patriots players fumbled even more frequently when paying for other NFL teams:
3) Learning ball possession skills in New England did NOT transfer to other NFL teams after players left:
4) In fact, the opposite was true – players were MORE secure carrying the football before even playing for the Patriots than they were after leaving the Patriots:
1) Doesn't that study debunk your entire argument, then? Aren't you yourself debunking your own argument? You're accusing the Patriots of cheating, yet the study concludes the balls naturally deflate under the same or similar conditions they were in during the AFC title game. If the Patriots inflated the balls to 12.5 PSI, which is regulation and perfectly legal, how then are they cheating? Should BB tell the weather not to get cold so the balls don't deflate below 12.5 PSI?
2) You do realize kickers use a different set of footballs from quarterbacks, right? That's true throughout the league.
3) Again with this number of touches to fumbles statistic. Does this number account for: age, experience, environment, situations, role on team, etc? All but five of those guys on that list were past their prime when they left New England. For them, any numbers they accrued after New England could be attributed to age and decline in ability just as it could be the ball...
For those five who were still "in their prime:"
Laurence Maroney 1 Fumble
BenJarvus Green-Ellis 5 Fumbles
Danny Woodhead 2 Fumbles
Ben Watson 1 Fumble
Brandon Tate 11 fumbles
Three of those five fumbled LESS than when they left. Danny Woodhead and Ben Watson have BETTER touches/fumble numbers after New England. The Law Firm became a starter in Cincy after leaving the Patriots, so he got more touches over a shorter time period. And as far as I know he's no longer in the league. Brandon Tate just sucks.
So again, these statistics tell a story, but I'm not sure they tell the story you think they tell.
It should be noted,
Mike Florio is now doubting whether this is a case of the Patriots cheating or a case of an old rival trying to get revenge. A source even said one of the footballs was about two pounds under pressure, but the others may have been closer to one pound, which is normal given the "study" you so easily dismissed already addressed that.
The Patriots could very well have cheated, but right now the evidence is mounting against that theory. We'll see what happens when this "investigation" is over. It's kind of interesting the league hasn't even talked to Tom Brady yet. Isn't the integrity of the sport important to the NFL? Seems strange they wouldn't talk to the guy most involved with the footballs for the offense...
But keep believing the Patriots cheat, because that's obviously what helps you feel better about your team sucking.