[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Si9AaWVbak"]The Gold Bull Market is Dead -- Long Live the Bull Market - YouTube[/ame]
Either the Chinese or the Russians are involved in this price manipulation.
I'd prefer gold over bitcoin too.. but I was just commenting on how dumb the whole putting gold on the eyelids to weigh them down thing sounded. Also, how if that's what someone had to come up with to support gold that's pretty sad sounding.
Bought 1,000 ounces of silver for $23.00 yesterday. My silver supplier was more than happy to sell only for only $.50 over spot.
Today the world's gold stock is about 170,000 metric tons. If all of this gold were melded together, it would form a cube of about 68 feet per side. (Picture it fitting comfortably within a baseball infield.) At $1,750 per ounce -- gold's price as I write this -- its value would be about $9.6 trillion. Call this cube pile A.Let's now create a pile B costing an equal amount. For that, we could buy all U.S. cropland (400 million acres with output of about $200 billion annually), plus 16 Exxon Mobils (the world's most profitable company, one earning more than $40 billion annually). After these purchases, we would have about $1 trillion left over for walking-around money (no sense feeling strapped after this buying binge). Can you imagine an investor with $9.6 trillion selecting pile A over pile B?
Beyond the staggering valuation given the existing stock of gold, current prices make today's annual production of gold command about $160 billion. Buyers -- whether jewelry and industrial users, frightened individuals, or speculators -- must continually absorb this additional supply to merely maintain an equilibrium at present prices.A century from now the 400 million acres of farmland will have produced staggering amounts of corn, wheat, cotton, and other crops -- and will continue to produce that valuable bounty, whatever the currency may be. Exxon Mobil (XOM) will probably have delivered trillions of dollars in dividends to its owners and will also hold assets worth many more trillions (and, remember, you get 16 Exxons). The 170,000 tons of gold will be unchanged in size and still incapable of producing anything. You can fondle the cube, but it will not respond.
I dunno. Buffet seems to be showing his moronic side once again here.Well when you look at it like that, I guess gold is severely overpricedWarren Buffet said:The 170,000 tons of gold will be unchanged in size and still incapable of producing anything. You can fondle the cube, but it will not respond.
Substitute the word "gold" for the words "US dollars".Well when you look at it like that, I guess gold is severely overpriced
Substitute the word "gold" for the words "US dollars".
Same problem.
Buffet is promoting a fallacy. You buy gold to speculate or to preserve wealth. It is not a productive asset. That's never been its role. The same came be said of a pile of rice. Or a shipload of steel. But those base commodity goods are CRUCIAL for Exxon et al to even exist, let alone function.
Everything starts in the economy with resource extraction.
Clearly the point in obtaining the gold in the first place would be to be able to resell it, and with those proceeds you could buy anything at all, far faster than you could with agricultural products and oil as your income.
Substitute the word "gold" for the words "US dollars".
Same problem.
Buffet is promoting a fallacy. You buy gold to speculate or to preserve wealth. It is not a productive asset. That's never been its role. The same came be said of a pile of rice. Or a shipload of steel. But those base commodity goods are CRUCIAL for Exxon et al to even exist, let alone function.
Everything starts in the economy with resource extraction.
Who was selling $24b in gold? Where did that info come from?
I looked up how much Cyprus was or was planning on selling and it was only like $500m