Bin Laden - Was a wealthy Saudi whose family does a lot of business with the US government, specifically reconstruction in Iraq and Kuwait.
Al Qaeda, as separate from Bin Laden - Possibly true
Terrorism, as separate from Al Qaeda specifically - They don't have exclusivity when it comes to terrorism.
Iraq was about WMD - Of course not.
Iraq was about freeing people - You ever free anyone by blowing them up and smashing all of their infrastructure, then confiscating their greatest natural resource? Free people don't live in cages.
Iraq was about securing strategic oil reserves - Partially.
Iraq was about destablising the mid-East - No.
Elder Protocols of Zion / Zionism as a conspiracy - I don't know what that is. I don't like Zionism as I understand it. It seems like radical colonialism. I'm not a mystic.
World Monetary Fund / IMF as concentrated effort to fuck things up (as oppose to just being idiots that don't pay attention to history) - The IMF and World Bank are criminal institutions. Read the "Economic Hitman" book. They are the global enforcement arm of Anglo-Saxon Mercantilism.
Climate Change - Happens. Solar activity is a big influence on climate.
Man Made Global Warming (very different from just "well, yeah, weather patterns ARE changing and seas ARE changing currents") - There is ZERO conclusive proof it is man made, and many experts reject the IPCC computer models, which have been known to be fed fudged data. CO2 is definitely bunk, as arctic core samples prove that warming leads CO2, not the other way around.
Obama's candidacy was rigged - All politics is rigged. If voting could change anything, it would be illegal. You can vote until you are blue in the face, the game is rigged against the little guy. Not to mention, I reject mob rule. It's incompatible with individual liberty.
All international struggles and policy are set by a small group of private individuals working cooperatively - Not all, but one has to ask what incentive a farmer, a butcher or a school teacher have in attacking a country half way around the world, populated by people they have never met, speaking a language they cannot understand. The answer, is none. As the legendary marine Smedley Butler said, "
War is a racket."
All international struggles and policy are set by a small group of private corporations - See above. There is a lot of money in war and property destruction. Much more than in taxes and subsidies.
All international struggles and policy are set by China because it controls 30% of the world's capital - Never heard that before. China is a fly in the international ointment. Asia and Africa are terribly under-represented with the IMF/Bilderberg/Club of Rome/CFR etc. It's probably racism since most of the world's elites are known (and proud) to be for eugenics.
Current flu epidemic is to control population, and prevent them from thinking about economic crisis - There is no epidemic. Look at the #s. The only people promoting that it is an epidemic are those with something to gain politically, specifically the WHO. Government likes to keep people scared. It justifies their law making and confiscation powers.
Problem > Reaction > Solution.
If the world had no problems, we wouldn't need government. Governments create enough problems to justify itself in the minds of many.
Economic crisis was specifically manufactured to allow one world currency - That's what it has accomplished, I'm not sure that was the goal, if there was a goal.
Economic crisis was manufactured to ensure US became a socialist democracy - The US was already becoming a socialist state. It has been since 1913. As soon as the goverment institutionalized income tax, and a fractional banking cartel, it was all downhill from there. The central bank is actually a core plank of the Communist manifesto. It is impossible to have pervasive socialism without centralizing control of debt and credit. The economic crisis is actually inspiring people to become in touch with their capitalist roots. If it was the plan, it is a bad plan. The tea parties will be bigger and more radical next year. People don't like being taxed during the bust, they tolerate it during the boom. People also really don't like socialism when they get it because it's the path to serfdom and misery.
Economic crisis happened because people running banks make decisions based on Magic 8balls, and certainly aren't worth they're 8-9 figure salaries - That's false. To understand why they make such huge wages, you have to understand two economic concepts. Marginal productivity and moral hazard. The incentive is to engage in morally hazardous behavior because the government socializes losses, and this generates potential for enormous returns with no downside, which validate a higher marginal productivity than a receptionist or night janitor.
I don't believe anyone who makes their money honestly makes too much. If you steal one dollar, you're a much more morally reprehensible creature than someone who honestly makes $100 million a year. The notion that people "make too much" is based upon a clever lie perpetuated for hundreds of years, that specifically play on envy. The more economic activity you generate, the more prosperity you generate. People who make a lot of money should be regarded as heroes. Wealthy people generate the most market activity, and accumulate capital for future investment. Read Atlas Shrugged.
Obviously, no one has the knowledge to make absolute statements about such large scale possibilities and conspiracies. Most of your ALL questions have an element of truth to them.
