posted by papajohn56:
This is a specious argument against life extension, because it assumes that a) everyone will want it, b) no one will ever grow tired of it, c) no advances in food/water/waste management/etc will occur, etc. ad infinitum.
Frank
more like for everyone - we'd run out of food, water, land, etc with nobody dying.
This is a specious argument against life extension, because it assumes that a) everyone will want it, b) no one will ever grow tired of it, c) no advances in food/water/waste management/etc will occur, etc. ad infinitum.
Frank