I give it a 8/10 chance that he was going to kill someone, especially when you see an assault rifle as one of his purchases.
if you're serious.. wow
I give it a 8/10 chance that he was going to kill someone, especially when you see an assault rifle as one of his purchases.
I thought it was the other way around? Waiting period on hand guns, not so much on rifles? I'm guessing that varies state by state though.
This bugs me a lot: Why do we care that it was an ASSAULT RIFLE OMG. Drug dealers are arrested with like semi-automatics and Uzis and shit all the time. I don't get what they're doing with them? Do they kill better than pistols?
Do they kill better than pistols?
In this type of case, the police can't win. People are now pissed that they arrested the man before he committed any crime, and people would be pissed if this man went on to kill half a dozen co-workers and while he gave off signals of distress beforehand.
Honestly, I think they did the right thing. I give it a 8/10 chance that he was going to kill someone, especially when you see an assault rifle as one of his purchases. I assume that the police will just detain him, and sign him up to a mental institution for a couple months.
one word: TOTALITARIANISM
Doesnt make sense to me, he was put on leave and he goes and drops some coin on guns, wouldnt he want to be saving his money?
The Alex Jones twist in 3,2,1...
I think that they did what they should. They did not arrest this guy. They did not even take away his guns. All they wanted to do was have a mental evaluation on him.
Heckler & Koch .45-caliber universal self-loading handgun, a Walther .380-caliber handgun and an AK-47 assault rifle
^Seriously man... implied facepalm