Seriously? Oh jeeze, it was all a false flag operation guys! We've been duped!
You might want to invest in aluminum stocks there scottspfd82.
You might want to invest in aluminum stocks there scottspfd82.
Gun attack on French magazine kills 12
- Thread starter acidie
- Start date
I think the typical criminal mindset is to commit a crime and get away with it. I suspect these 'criminals' ultimately wanted the world to know who they were. Sure they wore masks to avoid immediate identification, but they knew their car would eventually be located; presumably after they had made their escape (or committed other terrorist acts). Leaving the ID card meant there would be no question about who was responsible.
He probably was in school, and the other kids aren't lying. Maybe he was suppose to accompany the other two but never showed up. Maybe he realized he was only 18, was already getting a bunch of high school virgins anyway; so there was no point in murdering civilians and dying to get them. There is likely more to this story, and just because he has an alibi for Charlie murders doesn't mean he is completely innocent.
This statement gets overused every time something like this happens. 'WHO BENEFITS THE BIG GOVERNMENT ILLUMINATI ZIONIST' type of shit is old. If we really broke it down we could say everyone benefits to varying degrees. Even Charlie Hebdo could be said to have benefited, as they are now (more than ever) a household name across the world. I bet they would rather have their 12 executed colleagues back than the additional press, just a hunch though.
I have only one thing to say to you. Read the Koran. Have you?
Unfortunately, this is the prevailing sentiment in the Islamic world. Lack of awareness or education may be a factor, but they truly desire neither. The only book that they care about is the Koran which they believe to be sufficient knowledge on how to live life- a complete manual for anything and everything is what all Muslims agree it to be. So basically, when they see a white man (or any non Muslim) with a gun in their lands or bombs falling on them, they think Christian Crusaders or Kuffar. That is all that their lexicon affords them. It is always "us vs them" in Islam. No middle ground. The diabolical imams always cry about racism but fail to see how racist (for lack of a better word) Islam really is. They don't discriminate based on skin color, but if you are a non Muslim you don't even qualify as a human being and are absolutely expendable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1tEpjmFH9g
Just wait until redditors have finished going through the news footage. They're bound to find absolute proof it was a staged event with paid actors.
A Close Look at the French Far Right | VICE | Canada
And it begins! These guys should really think before they commit their terror stunts. They're only hurting their fellow Muslims, en-masse.
And it begins! These guys should really think before they commit their terror stunts. They're only hurting their fellow Muslims, en-masse.
I was semi-trolling, underwhelming reaction though.
I'm not saying it was or wasn't a false-flag. But suggesting that I'm paranoid/delusional for even entertaining the thought shows an ignorance of history or an understanding of how those in power manipulate the world.
It's common practice.
Here's just a few that we know about. Of course the ones that work are the ones we don't know about (at least at the time).
Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And an interesting read of proven False Flag ops throughout the years...
Americans Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror Washington's Blog
– Adolph Hitler
I'm not suggesting it's a false flag, I don't know. But if you think that powerful people don't do horrible shit to further their agenda, you've got a very sheltered view of history and how the world works.
Relevant, propaganda video from one of the groups mentioned in that article, Generation Identaire:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4e7n7g1xAM[/ame]
The Vice reporter called that video "bloodcurdling." Hahah.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQUc1_kM5Xg[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQUc1_kM5Xg[/ame]
10 minutes of asking why to form an argument that basically consists of "You're all a bunch of fucking sheeple"
Thanks, my feeble sheep mind has been enlightened, now if you don't mind I will go back to eating grass and bleating over Muslims.
I would write a more detailed response but my 10 minutes of giving a fuck ran out before I was able to do so.
Bhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
This is not about muslims its about ALL RELIGION. Every religion has fundamentalists because religion teaches you about how to hate and kill those that don't follow "YOUR gods orders".
The only difference between Islam and Christianity (for example) is that Christianity has moderated as more and more people turn away from the true doctrine. Look at the history of Christianity, it was A LOT worse than these muslim fundamentalists. In some instances you were not ALLOWED to BELIEVE in anything other than their doctrine on pain of death (e.g. The Inquisition).
There are two types of religious people in my opinion, one who REALLY believes the word of his god and is prepared to do WHATEVER he has been told to do by that god (i.e. a TRUE believer), and the other who is a convenient believer and just does whatever he feels like (i.e. he can't REALLY believe, otherwise he would be totally fearful of the consequences of not following his gods orders.)
First type is totally dangerous (but you can respect that they really do live their beliefs) and the other one is just dumb and pointless and is becoming a thing of the past.
Either way we will be so much better off once this Muslim wave of believers starts to moderate (maybe in 50 - 100 years or so) and Christianity gets pretty much wiped out all together by the huge number of people turning away from it (they are allowed to do that now you know?).
Enough of this "My sky daddy is better than yours" it's time to grow up!
The only difference between Islam and Christianity (for example) is that Christianity has moderated as more and more people turn away from the true doctrine. Look at the history of Christianity, it was A LOT worse than these muslim fundamentalists. In some instances you were not ALLOWED to BELIEVE in anything other than their doctrine on pain of death (e.g. The Inquisition).
There are two types of religious people in my opinion, one who REALLY believes the word of his god and is prepared to do WHATEVER he has been told to do by that god (i.e. a TRUE believer), and the other who is a convenient believer and just does whatever he feels like (i.e. he can't REALLY believe, otherwise he would be totally fearful of the consequences of not following his gods orders.)
First type is totally dangerous (but you can respect that they really do live their beliefs) and the other one is just dumb and pointless and is becoming a thing of the past.
Either way we will be so much better off once this Muslim wave of believers starts to moderate (maybe in 50 - 100 years or so) and Christianity gets pretty much wiped out all together by the huge number of people turning away from it (they are allowed to do that now you know?).
Enough of this "My sky daddy is better than yours" it's time to grow up!
Look at the old testament dude. Or has God changed his mind for some reason?
I am talking about the actual religion, not what is currently being practiced by the semi-believing (read non believing) moderates.
But you are right I am generalising, some religions don't demand violence. However the major 3 most definitely do.
I am talking about the actual religion, not what is currently being practiced by the semi-believing (read non believing) moderates.
But you are right I am generalising, some religions don't demand violence. However the major 3 most definitely do.
lolwut
I'm not a Christian, but yes that is pretty much what the Christian doctrine teaches. Jesus being the ultimate sacrifice and all. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, etc etc.
Where are they getting those statistics? If it is from census poles then they are extremely skewed. I hazard a guess that they are being extrapolated or just plain made up to serve an agenda.
hmm I am not sure that Jesus ever said that God has changed his mind.
Why would he change his mind about stoning adulterers or homosexuals?
I guess its like how God doesn't want people to wear condoms or to have blood transfusions, but then in the last 50 years also changed his mind.
It's all contradictory nonsense used to control people. "Gods word" changes as it becomes convenient for the moderate religions. Total illogical bunkum.
I guess I don't care enough to dig deep into the sources used to determine which religions people are into. But I've never seen any numbers that would lead me to believe that what you said is anywhere close to accurate - do you have any sources?
I should probably let a Christian speak on this, but basically the question of stoning adulterers was what that "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" response was in regards to. In other words, yes they still think it is wrong and should be punished, but that you're not blameless enough to stand in judgement of anyone or fit to deliver the punishment.
At least I think that's the way most Christians tend to interpret it.
Jew?
What part of me saying all religions are the same did you not understand?
I AM AN ATHEIST
Do I need to make it any clearer for you?