Changes

.Hack

.Hack

New member
Dec 10, 2009
2,999
127
0
Nothing Can Be Explained
After the whole PKM vs. EWA thing I decided there should be some changes around here. I'm going to start being way more active in banning fucktards, scammers, and subhumans in every section.

1. NO MORE PKM VS. EWA type of threads. I have perma banned Yousif and temp banned Eagle. Anyone who bumps any old threads or starts one will be banned.

2. Edit: RULE OUSTED

3. EDIT: DR's are allowed outside STS.

4. If you've been scammed by a member here don't start a thread unless you have evidence. PM me either way.

I'm also trying to get more sections added too.

So I would like to know what you guys would like to see more and less of with WF overall. BST, STS, ETC.
 
Last edited:


There's a table in section five needs cleared and that elderly couple at table 8 asked for more water ten minutes ago.
 
Rename "enlightened members" forum to "case studies". it'll encourage more participation in that forum, for what it is.
 
high-security-africa-danger-crazy-funny-02.jpg
 
Methinks .hack has let this whole moderator thing go to his head. While I'm sure he has good intentions he's acting like a one man show.

If he bans me you will know the reason why...
 
People with less than 3 or 5 or 10 posts should not be able to start threads. (This will stop 95% spam)
 
Ban fucktards, yes. The rest of it, not so much. WF loves drama.

If an affiliate network has robbed someone of a few grand posting a thread on WickedFire about it has got the OP's money back numerous times. Sure, some proof should be needed but stopping all threads <$10k about this sucks.
 
faceblogger said:
People with less than 3 or 5 or 10 posts should not be able to start threads. (This will stop 95% spam)
Click to expand...

I think this is the most important change that needs to happen. At least 5 or 10 posts to start a thread, or make it at least 5 posts and has been a member for at least 3 or 5 days to really stop these guys.
 
craigmc said:
Methinks .hack has let this whole moderator thing go to his head. While I'm sure he has good intentions he's acting like a one man show.

If he bans me you will know the reason why...
Click to expand...

Lol not at all. Just making it clear! The other mods are and will still be doing their thing.

faceblogger said:
People with less than 3 or 5 or 10 posts should not be able to start threads. (This will stop 95% spam)
Click to expand...

Amen
 
I'm also trying to get more sections added too.
Click to expand...

How about you tell us what sections you are thinking of adding and let the users decide if it something that is acceptable to the majority. I know there is hardly any reason to post boob threads anymore since they were moved out of the STS section, and the case studies (enlightened members) posts should have just been stickied imo.

TBH bro, it sounds like you are trying to take too much responsibility upon yourself - it'll burn you out eventually.


Edit: The dickroll thing - seriously, I've seen a few outside the STS section and not reported them because the people that copped them deserved them.
 
Might need some kind of a post-cap for new members as well. Post count bots will quickly attain the minimum posts needed to start threads, but if they can only start 1 per day, it would keep the volume down some.
 
learningcurve said:
How about you tell us what sections you are thinking of adding and let the users decide if it something that is acceptable to the majority. I know there is hardly any reason to post boob threads anymore since they were moved out of the STS section, and the case studies (enlightened members) posts should have just been stickied imo.

TBH bro, it sounds like you are trying to take too much responsibility upon yourself - it'll burn you out eventually.


Edit: The dickroll thing - seriously, I've seen a few outside the STS section and not reported them because the people that copped them deserved them.
Click to expand...

Good point. This is why I started the thread, to hear everyone's opinions
 
What about having a section for General digital marketing, Social media, Branding, etc?
 
.Hack said:
Good point. This is why I started the thread, to hear everyone's opinions
Click to expand...


I sort of assumed by the way you wrote your post that you already had some in mind. If you do I am sure everyone would like to know and then add from there until it gets to a point where the majority seems happy with it.


People with less than 3 or 5 or 10 posts should not be able to start threads. (This will stop 95% spam)
Click to expand...

No, it won't it will just increase the number of nonsensical and two word wonder posts to build up post counts until they can start their own threads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom