Journalist Assassinated?

dmnEPC said:
Remote control would be one way. Just cut all controll from vehicle and switch to RC. This is a known CIA practice. Either way the fire still doesnt make sense. Possibly a controlled detonation upon impact? I don't know way out of my depth. Even if no one touched that vehicle the .gov is still responsible.
Click to expand...

rc_car_goggles.jpg


Just when I thought you were starting to be more rational...
 


dchuk said:
rc_car_goggles.jpg


Just when I thought you were starting to be more rational...
Click to expand...

Irrational as in you don't think it's possible/plausible that someone could take over control of a car remotely?

Srs question, not sure what to make of the pic.
 
dchuk said:
rc_car_goggles.jpg


Just when I thought you were starting to be more rational...
Click to expand...

Could you explain what part wasn't rational? The RC stuff? Hell even the myth busters have crudely RC'd a car. Or the idea that even if the .gov didn't touch Michael or his car, they still killed him?


Edit. It would be more likely this was a remote detonated car bomb than a RC situation. That is if he didn't just get drunk and run his car into a tree. But apparently no foul play was suspected. And the police typically don't release owi'/ drunk driving accident reports. This is just a normal accident.
 
hellblazer said:
Or you mess with the guy's car slightly to disable the brakes and make the accelerator sticky. The vehicle burns so bad the evidence is destroyed. I'm not a mechanic, but I'm pretty sure there's ways you could do that.

I doubt that Wikileaks would simply make that shit up out of the blue, though. He was researching the orchestrated purge of the military and probably found out Kelley or Broadwell was an administration piece. So Obama ghosted him. Dead men tell no tales.
Click to expand...

It's as simple as plugging into the ECU
 
hellblazer said:
Or you mess with the guy's car slightly to disable the brakes and make the accelerator sticky. The vehicle burns so bad the evidence is destroyed. I'm not a mechanic, but I'm pretty sure there's ways you could do that.

I doubt that Wikileaks would simply make that shit up out of the blue, though. He was researching the orchestrated purge of the military and probably found out Kelley or Broadwell was an administration piece. So Obama ghosted him. Dead men tell no tales.
Click to expand...

Agreeing with hellblazer makes me uncomfortable, yet here we are.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaPHWNzTHQ]Michael Hastings Crash Caught On Surveillance Camera - New Footage - YouTube[/ame]

Survelience video of hastings car wreck. Seems like there is a low flash right before impact? Def not conclusive evidence of tampering.

And then there is this bizare video of Hastings starry eyed wife on Piers Morgan
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljHEcLzOiAc]Michael Hastings' Widow Finally Speaks on Piers Morgan Was His Death A Conspiracy? - Elise Jord - YouTube[/ame]
 
-joe- said:
I was listening to the scanners at the time, I can't remember the exact sequence of events, but I believe it was reported that a suspicious looking item had been left, they went to check it out, boom.
Click to expand...

nah it was completly unrelated and never to be talked about again. Nothing to see here. Move along
 
You guy's just arn't going to believe this shit.

Jordan served as a director for communications in the National Security Council from 2008-09. She worked in the White House Office of Presidential Speechwriting, at the U.S. Embassy, Baghdad and for the Commanding General's Strategic Advisory Group at the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) headquarters in Kabul, Afghanistan, as well as speechwriter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.[2]
Click to expand...

Elise Jordan Bio Wiki

This shit is pretty much priceless
 
Island said:
I was watching the interview with her after Michael Hasting's death and wondering why the fuck she seemed so upbeat and cheerful....
Click to expand...

People react in strange ways to grief. And that is without sitting in a TV studio being asked about the life of your just dead husband.

::emp::
 
dmnEPC said:
nah it was completly unrelated and never to be talked about again. Nothing to see here. Move along
Click to expand...
Yeah, I thought it was really strange how they publicly announced it in a country where police radios are unencrypted, then totally denied that the suspicious item had anything to do with the mysterious explosion.
 
windjc said:
Yes, obviously she married him to aid in his killing. That much is pretty obvious.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I am in no way implying their marriage had anything to do with his death. In fact I think that would be extremely far fetched, if not simply crazy. What I am implying is that if he was wacked (assuming she didnt have him killed for cheating on her), with her background it wouldnt be unusual to have been aproached to be quited down.

Would it be far fetched to have the company approach her? To say if you dig into this we will kill you? And then knowing she is a a master communicator to have her come out publicly? Is the whole idea crazy? Yes absoulutly. But it's crazy the police have a media gag order on an accident where it was immediatly announced to have been no foul play.

Roll your eyes all you want, but this whole incidint stinks
 
The only strange thing here is that the car burst into flames, but it still happens.

As for "he was not a known alcohol / drug abuser"

You don't have to be a junkie or alcoholic to get smashed once in a while.

::emp::
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom