UG was on the right path as to my line of thinking. The question is why did they choose to use this particular group in the first place? The point is the .gov is changing who it considers to be a threat. They are getting the public acclimated to the idea that the new face of terror is homegrown "extremist". All the while it some may argue that the so called "extremist" have never even committed an act of terror on US soil. Whether you think that or not, it cant be argued that the "libertarian" or Tea Party movement has been villainized and demonized over the last couple years. And the sentiment is growing daily. And the mainstream media, with it's WH talking points have brainwashed many into believing these very people are bad.
And 1 quick question. Why doesn't it bother you when a gang of men play dress up donning military uniforms and weaponry and march down the street? Claiming to Protect and to Serve. All while locking up more of it's citizens than any country on the planet. That's doesn't bother you?
"They" being a bunch of game developers? Sounds like they are a group of guys who watch the news and were tired of making 3d models of A-Rabs and sand castles. You're sounding incredibly tin-foily today, it's a fucking video game dude. A video game from an old franchise that has focused on most contemporary military threats.
Your line of reasoning here is along the lines of "grand theft auto conditioned me to carjack people and run over hookers". Again, it's a fucking video game, literally every possible type of enemy has been or will be created in the name of entertainment.