Romney to announce VP on Saturday

Just expand the definition of "treason" to include self serving actions by publicly elected officials.

Make a few sacrifices and then see who wants to be elected and how they behave while being held accountable to the people who elected them.
 


shindig said:
Just expand the definition of "treason" to include self serving actions by publicly elected officials.
Click to expand...
And here's how you can accomplish this:

Step 1. Find a Unicorn.
Step 2. ???
Step 3. Get the politicians to vote such restrictions onto themselves.

That ought to do it...
 
hellblazer said:
I am convinced that the Ron Paul movement, along with the Alex Jones movement, are controlled and directed by the international communists, in order to peel off libertarian/conservative voters,
Click to expand...

The reality is they have peeled off a younger demographic, many of whom who were likely to vote Democrat in a lesser of two evils type of way.

You don't have to be Republican to vote in a NH primary. The exit polls showed how good Paul did with democrats, liberals, independents :
Exit Polls - 2012 New Hampshire Primary | Politics | Fox News


The real problem with the Republican Party is that for the past 30/40 years, they have been taken over by moderates
Click to expand...

We are proud of and shall continue our far-reaching and sound advances in matters of basic human needs—expansion of social security—broadened coverage in unemployment insurance —improved housing—and better health protection for all our people. We are determined that our government remain warmly responsive to the urgent social and economic problems of our people.

Republican Party Platform of 1956


We will vigorously implement the Republican conceived home-ownership program for lower income families and also the Republican-sponsored rent certificate program.

To treat the special problems of children from impoverished families, we advocate expanded, better programs

plans for federal assistance which would include state distribution of such aid

No young American should be denied a quality education because he cannot afford it

help provide the hungry poor sufficient food for a balanced diet

We will also press for enactment of Republican-sponsored programs for financing of hospital modernization.

We will strengthen the Social Security system

The plight of American Indians and Eskimos is a national disgrace.

We will support the efforts of the Puerto Rican people to achieve statehood

We regret that the Administration's budgetary mismanagement has forced sharp reductions in the space program.

Republican Party Platform of 1968
 
Another one of those dingbats who fetishes the America that never was, the America of white picket fences, June and Ward Cleaver, with a Don Knotts as every small town deputy.
 
lukep said:
LOL... Funny... But just in case you were 1% serious, the "people" that write those pay raises are... Congressmen. Doh.
Click to expand...
This is essentially Hoppe's critique of Constitutional government, and a very strong argument for anarchy.

Once you create a monopoly government, only the bureaucrats can meaningfully change it. And their class interests are almost directly opposite those of the [sic] citizens.
 
ThisWebThing said:
Bottom line: 2 choices this nov. Full Stop.
Click to expand...
Yes, Conservative Fascism or Liberal Fascism.

How exciting!

As an aside, I love how all of the boobs buy into the "we gotta beat Obama" narrative, when Obama has basically done the same shit Bush did. If Romney gets elected, he will do exactly what Obama was doing. It's a system run by power elites. The little guy doesn't matter except that if he participates and consents to the process, he produces more taxes than if he resists and is openly enslaved.

The entire notion of an election where anything meaningful will be decided is so obviously stupid, I truly feel bad for anyone sucked up into it.
 
guerilla said:
Yes, Conservative Fascism or Liberal Fascism.

How exciting!

As an aside, I love how all of the boobs buy into the "we gotta beat Obama" narrative, when Obama has basically done the same shit Bush did. If Romney gets elected, he will do exactly what Obama was doing. It's a system run by power elites. The little guy doesn't matter except that if he participates and consents to the process, he produces more taxes than if he resists and is openly enslaved.

The entire notion of an election where anything meaningful will be decided is so obviously stupid, I truly feel bad for anyone sucked up into it.
Click to expand...


Were do you think the so called Tea Party came from? They really did'nt like the bush politics.....


Romney will give more time to build up ones private stash of so called cash, but a financial melt down of some sort is coming....
 
guerilla said:
This is essentially Hoppe's critique of Constitutional government, and a very strong argument for anarchy.
Click to expand...
In my case the sad thing is that I had all the evidence of this and therefore the evil of the state in my grasp when I worked in my state legislature as a teenager. I joked about with my friends at school how the senators could vote themselves raises and no one had the power to deny it really... We all just laughed at this info, as if to say "what a funny world." -When in fact it was proof I was living under fascism, but apparently didn't want to see that.


ThisWebThing said:
Bottom line: 2 choices this nov. Full Stop.
Click to expand...
Yup, Liberty or Tyranny.

For Tyranny, it will be available inside all voting booths for you to vote for... Doesn't matter which button you press, they all result in the exact same life afterwards. (If the voting machine even bothers to record a vote, which I doubt.)
 
ThisWebThing said:
Were do you think the so called Tea Party came from? They really did'nt like the bush politics...
Click to expand...
Sure they did. They love the welfare/warfare state. They just hated Obama.

ThisWebThing said:
Romney will give more time to build up ones private stash of so called cash
Click to expand...
Don't kid yourself. Romney invented Obamacare. Anyone who thinks there is an inch of difference between Romney and Obama policy wise is pretty deluded.
 
guerilla said:
Sure they did. They love the welfare/warfare state. They just hated Obama.




Don't kid yourself. Romney invented Obamacare. Anyone who thinks there is an inch of difference between Romney and Obama policy wise is pretty deluded.
Click to expand...

The tea party is full of small business owners, im sure there are people in the tp that like welfare crap.. doesnt everyone now-a-days?

I understand some of what your saying, but i do think there would be more then an inch of difference in policy... but my bottom line is ... there will still be some sort of financial disaster ...

but given the 2 choices, i think romney would be a better choice of the not 2 great choices.
 
ThisWebThing said:
i do think there would be more then an inch of difference in policy... but my bottom line is ... there will still be some sort of financial disaster ...

but given the 2 choices, i think romney would be a better choice of the not 2 great choices.
Click to expand...

I hate to wear this thing out so quickly, but a lot of people seem to really need it around here:

UuNJm.jpg



BTW, in case you think RomneyCare, written by the very hands of his new VP, is one Iota different than ObamaCare, then you should know that in the words of Jonathan Gruber, who helped Ryan & Romney design both the Romney and Obama plans: “These two bills are the same fucking bill. Romney can try point to insignificant changes, but he'd be dishonest to do so.”

MOAR: Romneycare and Obamacare Differ Only in Inconsequential Ways - The Daily Beast


When are you sheeple going to see the extremely obvious pattern about how both the red team and the blue team always offer you the exact same "choices?"
 
guerilla said:
Yes, Conservative Fascism or Liberal Fascism.

How exciting!

As an aside, I love how all of the boobs buy into the "we gotta beat Obama" narrative, when Obama has basically done the same shit Bush did. If Romney gets elected, he will do exactly what Obama was doing. It's a system run by power elites. The little guy doesn't matter except that if he participates and consents to the process, he produces more taxes than if he resists and is openly enslaved.

The entire notion of an election where anything meaningful will be decided is so obviously stupid, I truly feel bad for anyone sucked up into it.
Click to expand...

The reason they are using the "we gotta beat Obama" is because during the early primaries, it showed to be the biggest issue in exit polls and focus groups. For all the things they suck at, presidential campaigns are very good at telling people what they want to hear (see above post for proof).
 
jryan21 said:
The reason they are using the "we gotta beat Obama" is because during the early primaries, it showed to be the biggest issue in exit polls and focus groups. For all the things they suck at, presidential campaigns are very good at telling people what they want to hear (see above post for proof).
Click to expand...


Who do you support?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom