The White Knight Of SEO Is At It Again
- Thread starter Kaedus
- Start date
If this guy is so good at "seo" (and knows the google algo which i would think changes from time to time 
) he should just go for #1 for Car Insurance etc...
This is nonsense stuff here.
Build your sites, ignore all this nonsense.
Spam = content. (build out your content, something people in your "niche" might like, do a little social if you can must... and call it a day)
All is pretty much guesswork here, always will be...... to a changing algo... a moving target.
) he should just go for #1 for Car Insurance etc...This is nonsense stuff here.
Build your sites, ignore all this nonsense.
Spam = content. (build out your content, something people in your "niche" might like, do a little social if you can must... and call it a day)
All is pretty much guesswork here, always will be...... to a changing algo... a moving target.
This thing doesn't pass the so what test. SEOMoz gave your sites inbound links a spam score of 22 - so what?
It doesn't change a thing in the Google SERPs. Last I checked the Google SERPs were more important than anything SEOMoz tools showed you.
It doesn't change a thing in the Google SERPs. Last I checked the Google SERPs were more important than anything SEOMoz tools showed you.
Guys, it won't be hard to manipulate and noisy it up. Every footprint that gets maked as MOZspam can quickly get pointed to inbound.org if you are so inclined. This project is coming from the guy that claims negative seo doesn't work in 99% of all cases...a statement which actual practioners of search marketing know to be quite invalid. So, I wouldn't worry a heck of a lot about it.
Can someone with photoshop skills please take a picture of Rand and make him slowly turn into a picture of Cutts.
Yeah guys, I think we'll be safe from this braintrust:
I literally shit my pants.
Also Gary A. Fowler would do great prison: 1) Sucks Dick 2) Snitches
Negative SEO doesn't work in the way that many people claim it does. Using tactics like spamming links all to 1 anchor kw is only ever going to work for taking down small-medium sites.
Real negative SEO verges on being illegal: fraudulent DMCA requests, spam reports, all sorts of crap like that to remove links to a domain and generally damage their online reputation. Even that though you're never going to manage to do to the likes of inbound.org, or seomoz. They just have too many links, you'd have to have a real vendetta and a huge ass team with tons of cash to get close to making a dent.
Not to mention those particular guys are all up in Matt's ass, so can likely get any penalty lifted if there was one anyway.
That sounds eerily similar to my negative SEO tactic: Tell the RIAA the site you want taken down is illegally hosting music.