This is just sad -

[elkyy]

you dont have 100k to spend on it because you waste your time making stupid fucking threads

This.

 

[JamesH]

Yeah the "© 2001-2009 Roche Laboratories inc. All rights reserved." might be a giveaway.

Shit, didn't even see that.

 

[Fatbat]

Did you seriously design the Hot Spurs team jersey?

Yeah, for the last 3 seasons plus the coming year. Just the sponsorship logos mind you, the shirt style and colours were decided on by the team.

 

[Jon]

IMHO that policy is taken a little to far sometimes. It's one thing when you're revealing competitive info. It's another if you show everyone something that could be found by going to google, typing in Acai and clicking on the first paid result.

But, whatever...I never post anything even remotely questionable to avoid being crucified.

Agreed! Plus, don't most of you have scrapers constantly mining for ads/LP's of all the campaigns avail anyway? So who cares anymore..

I know I sure as hell wouldn't care if the rule was relaxed or removed altogether.

 

[papajohn56]

Agreed! Plus, don't most of you have scrapers constantly mining for ads/LP's of all the campaigns avail anyway? So who cares anymore..

I know I sure as hell wouldn't care if the rule was relaxed or removed altogether.

yeah it gets a little old seeing hall monitor non-mods try to call people out on this rule, like a guy being afraid to post a link to snopes as a result

 

[cardine]

Outing most landing pages is fine. Just don't out unique landing pages that are profiting because nobody else has thought of the idea. Just use common sense. If something is getting media attention you aren't doing any harm by posting about it on WF.

 

[guysmy]

hey now. this site won the www health awards gold medal in spring 2003... twice.

 

[guerilla]

you dont have 100k to spend on it because you waste your time making stupid fucking threads

Word.

 

[Enigmabomb]

Jon,

I agree with you on the landing page thing, it's out of hand. Who made this rule?

 

[Enigmabomb]

If you dont want WF outing your lander, set a referrer redirect to make monies. It's that simple

 

[Pr0xyhub]

It's not my policy, but exposing landing pages is a no-no here.

FAIL.

you're a fucking moron

FAIL.

 

[Webferret]

go girls, go!

 

[Moxie]

Agreed! Plus, don't most of you have scrapers constantly mining for ads/LP's of all the campaigns avail anyway? So who cares anymore..

I know I sure as hell wouldn't care if the rule was relaxed or removed altogether.

I assumed it had more to do with not spoon-feeding all of the new people that must browse in here every day. No big secrets would be revealed or anything, but it might encourage a lot those that are better off trying to do something else.

 

[AffAholic]

It's not my policy, but exposing landing pages is a no-no here.

FAIL.

^^^^^ you are an idiot

 

[BlueYonder]

^^^^^ you are an idiot

Fuck up your ass with a wire brush.

I don't care if people post landing pages, or almost-landing pages. Other people get their knickers in a twist over it.

 

[dodgy]

Nice...Breaks out the chips...

Please keep going lads...

 

[Bofu2U]

if referral == wickedfire, 301 -> makemonies

 

[riddarhusetgal]

The site shows the value of a premium domain property. It reminds me of a thread someone started yesterday and someone said "why would anyone spend $100,000 for a [stupid] domain?!" - I LOL'ed all day at that.

These assets are still so little understood - fortunately.


Rick Schwartz had an interesting post the other day about how $1 M domains are going for $10K today so scoop them up!

I'll bet there are probably legions of people saying "why would anyone spend $10k for a domain"?

Someone please show me any other asset these days that can yield a %500 to %1000 return??

Yung Ye was the Keyser Söze......lol

one man show/$19M in profits off of $20M a year/public capital market exit/never to be heard from again.......

 

[emp]

I know this site is doing well, owned by a big company, etc... I still agree, it is sad to see it in this state.

::emp::