I can't speak for Jake...
You come at things logically. This has been clear for years. So, feel free to speak for me.
At UG:
You're not busting my balls. I have a keen sense of what is logically derived, and dismiss anything that is not (including positions I've taken). Plus, when I'm about to post, I always consider my options:
A. post on WF
B. spend time with family or friends
C. read (learn)
D. make fun of women
E. make money
This has all been said before. In the end it's only up to Jon to implement new rules (eg 100 post rule) or add more mods (to help with massive amounts of garbage posts).
Here's how I imagine a conversation with Jon about this stuff:
Me: "Jon, ya gotta do something. WF is deteriorating."
Jon: "You want to buy WF?"
Me: "No."
Jon: "You want to advertise on WF?"
Me: "No."
Jon: "You want to moderate WF?"
Me: "No."
Jon: "Then, why are you bothering me?"
Me: "Good question."
Regarding SBT, if I need someone to write, link, design, program, etc., I'll ask folks whose opinions I trust. I no longer trust itrader.
A 100-post requirement will solve nothing. It will
seem to be a solution over the short run, like sex with a partner you despise. But it will be gamed. We'll look back in a year, and realize we're saddled with another rule.