I see how areas where soccer has potential for growth are good places for World Cups. Its a great idea in theory. But in reality, I really don't think you have any idea what you're talking about. The FIFA Executive Committee is made up of representatives from various associations (countries all over the world). You don't think those votes can be bought? You don't think there is corruption? There were supposed to be 24 votes cast for the 2018 and 2022 WCs. Only 22 were cast because the Nigerian and Tahitian members were suspended when they were exposed for corruption by the British media.
Qatar is a fucking terrible location to host a World Cup.
- Only 1 facility in place at the moment built to standards.
- Access to alcohol is extremely limited. No one wants to go to the World Cup and stay sober. That's an abomination
- Its going to be hilarious seeing white women from all over the world wearing fucking headscarves
- The weather will be SHIT. Temperatures reach 122 degrees in the summer
- Public transportation is SHIT
- Their team is SHIT. They've never even qualified for the WC
I'll accept that it may be good for soccer in that region. But based on the merits of infrastructure, transportation, stadiums, and revenue potential, USA was clearly the best choice. But then again, I'm biased because I'm American.