How many screens do you have?

How many monitors do you HAS?


  • Total voters
    545
i have 5...
3702900595_7b7bbe457a_o.jpg


3702898855_035521721d_o.jpg


3702900015_66e7a8971c_o.jpg


3703705644_6de644c678_o.jpg
 


the only bad thing about multiple computers is that its kinda a pain to have to swap files and you cannot copy and paste whats on one screen to the other computer although

The fuck you can't. Google "multiplicity" for multiple monitor management. I have 3 Pcs, 3 monitors, and can cut/paste from one to the other...
 

fvaldez,
As nice as this setup is, you're doing something potentially wrong here, and that's having 3 monitors TOO LARGE side by side. Your neck must constantly be rotating. If that's cool for you, ok, but come back to this thread in 6 months and you're gonna have neck problems.

If you need 3 monitors, the ideal solution is to get a mount for them so they can be raised higher (more at eye level), and 19" monitors, with the same configuration. The less turning your neck has to do, the better.

I used to have the same setup and thought if it wasnt 24" or more, it wasnt worth it, but I've found 3 19"s side by side increase my productivity more because my head doesnt have to turn as much so I can move faster.
 
1 big ass CRT,

Funny how 15 year old technology has better color reproduction/gamut, refresh rate, 180 viewing angles, no backlight bleeding, no input lag and no flimsy construction/stand, no dead pixels, blacks are BLACK, white's are WHITE - fuck I hate lcd's...

/waiting on OLED's
 
1 24" WS. I think I'd eventually like to try out having 2 17" WS screens turned landscape to either the side of the 24" so that they're all flush in height.
 
fvaldez,
As nice as this setup is, you're doing something potentially wrong here, and that's having 3 monitors TOO LARGE side by side. Your neck must constantly be rotating. If that's cool for you, ok, but come back to this thread in 6 months and you're gonna have neck problems.

If you need 3 monitors, the ideal solution is to get a mount for them so they can be raised higher (more at eye level), and 19" monitors, with the same configuration. The less turning your neck has to do, the better.

I used to have the same setup and thought if it wasnt 24" or more, it wasnt worth it, but I've found 3 19"s side by side increase my productivity more because my head doesnt have to turn as much so I can move faster.

i hear you but most of the turning happens at the chair level..not the neck.

Actually, the biggest drawback i see is the heat lol.... i swear.. they do get hot and they get to you.
 
Dude look at your setup! Your monitors are 6" from your face! Only you can prevent wallpaper forest fires buddy :-)

re: swinging your chair as you switch to every monitor. Oh yeah, that's better. How about moving NOTHING but
your eyes. I assume you're using all 3 a lot as you work, do you actually swivel left, right, left, middle, right every few
seconds? WTF man! Sit on a dildo while you're at it.
 
Funny how 15 year old technology has better color reproduction/gamut, refresh rate, 180 viewing angles, no backlight bleeding, no input lag and no flimsy construction/stand, no dead pixels, blacks are BLACK, white's are WHITE - fuck I hate lcd's...

You simply need to invest in better quality than the el cheapo $199 priced panels.

There's nothing flimsy about upper end Dell, Apple, HP, Viewsonic, etc.

Refresh rates don't work the same, but pixel timing of 2-6 ms is the norm these days.

Viewing angles aren't quite 180 degrees, but it's close... who works on their monitor from a 90 degree angle?

I don't have any backlight bleeding on the Dell, but the 6 year old Viewsonics do.

Input lag? WTF is that?

Dead pixels, none. Any good manufacturer has a zero dead pixel warranty now.

Colour is good, blacks could be a bit blacker, but the key is to go for models with at least 3,000:1 contrast ratio. Certainly not as good as the CRTs of old with 10k:1 but it's not that bad man. I had a 21" Sony Trinitron that died with just days to go in it's 3 year warranty. Between the time I bought it and the time it died Sony had stopped making them, so they offered me an LCD to replace it, but the models at the time had shit specs. They cut me a cheque for $1,600 and I replaced it with a Viewsonic from their pro VP line.

That Sony weighed nearly 60 pounds though and took up an enormous amount of real estate on the desk, and of course it put off way more electro magnetic radiation than any LCD panel does.

So you take the good with the bad.
 
2 x v7 17" I stole from my old job. I move around a lot so don't bother to buy expensive desktops.
 
1 big ass CRT,

Funny how 15 year old technology has better color reproduction/gamut, refresh rate, 180 viewing angles, no backlight bleeding, no input lag and no flimsy construction/stand, no dead pixels, blacks are BLACK, white's are WHITE - fuck I hate lcd's...

/waiting on OLED's

The NEC WUXi or the HP Dreamcolor range will kick the ass of any CRT you're running. None of the tired old CRT excuses you listed are relevant anymore.
 
fvaldez,
As nice as this setup is, you're doing something potentially wrong here, and that's having 3 monitors TOO LARGE side by side. Your neck must constantly be rotating. If that's cool for you, ok, but come back to this thread in 6 months and you're gonna have neck problems.

If you need 3 monitors, the ideal solution is to get a mount for them so they can be raised higher (more at eye level), and 19" monitors, with the same configuration. The less turning your neck has to do, the better.

I used to have the same setup and thought if it wasnt 24" or more, it wasnt worth it, but I've found 3 19"s side by side increase my productivity more because my head doesnt have to turn as much so I can move faster.


You made me think :338: