Funny how 15 year old technology has better color reproduction/gamut, refresh rate, 180 viewing angles, no backlight bleeding, no input lag and no flimsy construction/stand, no dead pixels, blacks are BLACK, white's are WHITE - fuck I hate lcd's...
You simply need to invest in better quality than the el cheapo $199 priced panels.
There's nothing flimsy about upper end Dell, Apple, HP, Viewsonic, etc.
Refresh rates don't work the same, but pixel timing of 2-6 ms is the norm these days.
Viewing angles aren't quite 180 degrees, but it's close... who works on their monitor from a 90 degree angle?
I don't have any backlight bleeding on the Dell, but the 6 year old Viewsonics do.
Input lag? WTF is that?
Dead pixels, none. Any good manufacturer has a zero dead pixel warranty now.
Colour is good, blacks could be a bit blacker, but the key is to go for models with at least 3,000:1 contrast ratio. Certainly not as good as the CRTs of old with 10k:1 but it's not that bad man. I had a 21" Sony Trinitron that died with just days to go in it's 3 year warranty. Between the time I bought it and the time it died Sony had stopped making them, so they offered me an LCD to replace it, but the models at the time had shit specs. They cut me a cheque for $1,600 and I replaced it with a Viewsonic from their pro VP line.
That Sony weighed nearly 60 pounds though and took up an enormous amount of real estate on the desk, and of course it put off way more electro magnetic radiation than any LCD panel does.
So you take the good with the bad.