...Ohio is to try again to execute a man convicted of murder after his death by lethal injection was botched earlier this week when technicians spent two hours in a futile hunt for a vein able to take a needle.
At one point, Romell Broom, who was convicted of rape and murder of a teenage girl 25 years ago, tried to help prison officers find a suitable vein by moving around and flexing his muscles. The prison governor later thanked him for his cooperation.
What critics of the death penalty are describing as the "virtually unprecedented" failure of the attempt to execute Broom, 53, has again raised questions over its continued use in the US. Concerns have also been raised over a case in Texas in which a man is facing execution despite an admission by the judge and prosecutor in his trial that they were lovers.
Romell Broom to face execution next week following botched lethal injection | World news | guardian.co.ukTexas is also grappling with revelations that it may have executed an innocent man five years ago after he was convicted of murdering his three children through arson on the basis of deeply flawed "scientific" evidence that has been compared to the stuff of witch trials.
I'm sure some people here are pro-death penalty, but I've yet to hear a convincing argument for why it should continue to exist in a modern democratic society. I'm fairly sure there's only one developed country left that still enforces it.
I guess it helps keep the sheeple under control by re-enforcing their distorted view of justice and helping to add to their daily dose of violence. I can understand why a government might want it and how the dumb fucks are conditioned into thinking it is a good thing, but what are the reasoned, logical arguments for state-sanctioned murder?