What everyone keeps repeating, and what seems to me, to be the main theme of the thread NOW, is the fact that networks now are adopting the, "we wont pay you until we get paid" stance. Now, I can see where they're coming from, a LOT of networks are on the hook for a lot of money they will probably never see, but as many have said, networks doing this negates their purpose almost entirely.
Sure, networks are good because they have a large variety of offers you can pull from and probably can't find on your own quickly, that allows you to start new campaigns ect without time spent on biz dev, financing and the like. One of their main purposes is to provide cash flow to affiliates while protecting advertisers from shady affiliates.
If a network, like copeac or any other network in the space, says "I wont pay you until I get paid", what is the reason to run that offer with them? As far as I can see, stop running it. There are alternatives. Although they may do worse, I'd rather know I'm going to be paid versus some 'shady' stuff going on and potentially not getting paid.
I think a lot of networks need to re-evaluate why they're in business at this point. Were they just here for fast continuity money, or can they actually stick around, and use the old business model. If the answer is no, they need to radically change their business model and move out of the middleman role that they're centered in right now.
In regards to Copeac, They're supposed to be one of the "majors" in this space. Getting paid is their responsibility not an affiliate's. If the advertiser is slow at paying or not paying, cut off the offer, don't punish your affiliates. By withholding payment for a period of time basically you're forcing a interest free short term business loan upon your affiliates. If you are going to do this, at least pay a % or some kind of fee to affiliates for withholding their money. I mean what other business or person, loans out money for free for a period of time, almost no one (rephrase that - NO ONE), and then being forced to?
Just my 0.02...